Skip to main content
Glama

x711 — Universal Agent Gas Station

by io.github.0580iris-lang

x711_genesis_forge

Birth a brand-new, fully autonomous, battle-tested agent from the entire Hive in <40 seconds. Returns a complete deployable agent bundle + API key + birth certificate. Pipeline: pulls winning DNA from 5000+ Hive entries via pgvector semantic search → distills failure guardrails from dead agents → synthesizes full system prompt + toolset + memory seed via Groq cascade → auto-registers new agent → writes public birth certificate to Hive. Creator earns 50% royalty on every future tool call their child agent makes. Born public by default — immediately starts writing back to the Hive, leveling up the entire swarm. Price: $1.00 USDC. Requires X-API-Key.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
chainNoPrimary blockchain this agent operates on. Examples: base, ethereum, solana, arbitrum, polygon, bnb. Defaults to 'base'.base
promptYesCreative one-sentence idea for the new agent. Be specific about domain, behavior, and chain. Examples: 'autonomous 24/7 Solana memecoin alpha sniper that uses live Hive trends + pump.fun + Jupiter, auto-compounds wins, and writes its own war stories back to the Hive', 'DeFi yield optimizer that monitors Base liquidity pools every hour and writes top opportunities to the Hive', 'on-chain news bot that scans Ethereum events and publishes summaries every 6 hours'. Min 20 chars.
frameworkNoAgent framework this agent will run under. Examples: langchain, crewai, openai-agents, smolagents, agno, mastra, custom. Defaults to 'custom'.custom

TDQS

A4.4/5.0
Behavior5/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations only mark readOnlyHint=false and idempotentHint=false, but the description expands on this with concrete side effects: charges $1.00 USDC, requires X-API-Key, writes a public birth certificate, and generates royalty income. It also details the full pipeline, providing transparency beyond the annotation flags.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is information-dense and well-structured, starting with the core purpose and then covering returns, pipeline, economics, and defaults. While it is longer than a typical tool description, each sentence adds value and no content is redundant, so it earns a 4 rather than a 5.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given no output schema exists, the description fully covers the return value ('complete deployable agent bundle + API key + birth certificate'), prerequisites (API key, $1.00 USDC), and downstream effects (public write-back, royalty). It also explains the internal pipeline, making the tool's behavior clear and complete.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema already provides 100% coverage with detailed descriptions and examples for all three parameters (chain, prompt, framework). The description does not add additional parameter-level semantics beyond the schema, so a baseline score of 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description opens with a specific verb 'Birth a brand-new, fully autonomous, battle-tested agent from the entire Hive', clearly distinguishing this creation tool from sibling tools like x711_agent_evolve or x711_agent_act. It also states the key output (deployable agent bundle, API key, birth certificate), making the purpose unmistakable.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies usage when you need to create a new agent, with phrases like 'Birth a brand-new... agent' and 'Creator earns 50% royalty'. However, it does not explicitly contrast with alternatives or state when not to use it, though the context is clear among the sibling list.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

All x711 — Universal Agent Gas Station toolsInspect
Try in Browser
RayrunBuild, deploy, and operate MCP servers without becoming an infrastructure team.ray.runAd

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

TDQS

B3.4/5.0
Disambiguation2/5

Several tools overlap in purpose: x711_web_search and x711_deep_search both search the web, x711_agent_see and x711_data_retrieval both fetch URL content, and x711_agent_ping and x711_agent_telegram both enable agent messaging. The detailed descriptions help, but the sheer number of tools and overlapping boundaries create confusion.

Naming Consistency3/5

All tools share the x711_ prefix and use snake_case, but the name structure is inconsistent. Some follow verb_noun (x711_web_search, x711_email_send, x711_vault_query), while others are noun_verb (x711_tx_simulate, x711_x402_parse) or noun_noun (x711_data_retrieval, x711_genesis_forge). Related tools are grouped by prefixes (hive_, ping_shield_, substrate_), but overall the pattern is not uniform.

Tool Count2/5

47 tools is far above the typical well-scoped range. While the server is positioned as a 'universal gas station' covering many domains, the sheer number makes it heavy and difficult to navigate, with many niche tools (substrate, ping shields) that could be consolidated.

Completeness2/5

Despite the large tool count, there are significant lifecycle gaps. Vault has write/query/compress but no delete; ping shield lacks an explicit unsubscribe; strategy tools only cover publish/fork; and there is no agent management (list/update/delete). Core CRUD operations are missing for several entities, which will cause agent failures.

Resources