Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a tool with 6 parameters, annotations, and an output schema, the description covers purpose, inputs, outputs, use case, and async behavior. It does not detail error conditions or rate limits, but annotations handle safety and idempotency, and the async advice suggests potential timeouts. Minor gaps but largely complete.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.