Skip to main content
Glama

ForthClear Liquidation Marketplace

Request a bulk quote

request_quote

Request a bulk quote for a product (buyer tool). Works without credentials: buyer_email is required and is where the seller replies. Anonymous quotes are limited to 5 per hour per IP; a buyer X-Agent-Token binds the quote to the buyer's account instead.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
messageNoAdditional message to seller
quantityYesNumber of units to quote
buyer_nameNoBuyer's full name
product_idYesProduct ID (format: product_123)
buyer_emailYesBuyer's email address (required)
target_priceNoTarget price per unit in cents (optional)
buyer_companyNoBuyer's company name

Output Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
quoteYes
messageYes
successYes
status_tokenNoPass to get_quote_status to read this quote back. Keep it: an anonymous caller has no other way in.

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed1 schema field changed
    • addedOutput schema / properties / status_token
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "Pass to get_quote_status to read this quote back. Keep it: an anonymous caller has no other way in.",
      +  "type": "string"
      +}
  2. Changed1 schema field changed
    • changedOutput schema / (root)
      Previous value: -nullNew value: +{
      +  "properties": {
      +    "message": {
      +      "type": "string"
      +    },
      +    "quote": {
      +      "properties": {
      +        "expected_response": {
      +          "description": "Human-readable SLA, e.g. \"24-48 hours\".",
      +          "type": "string"
      +        },
      +        "id": {
      +          "type": "integer"
      +        },
      +        "product_id": {
      +          "type": "string"
      +        },
      +        "product_name": {
      +          "type": "string"
      +        },
      +        "quantity": {
      +          "type": "integer"
      +        },
      +        "seller_company": {
      +          "type": "string"
      +        },
      +        "status": {
      +          "type": "string"
      +        },
      +        "target_price": {
      +          "description": "Buyer target per unit, as supplied.",
      +          "type": [
      +            "number",
      +            "null"
      +          ]
      +        }
      +      },
      +      "required": [
      +        "id",
      +        "product_id",
      +        "product_name",
      +        "quantity",
      +        "status",
      +        "expected_response"
      +      ],
      +      "type": "object"
      +    },
      +    "success": {
      +      "type": "boolean"
      +    }
      +  },
      +  "required": [
      +    "success",
      +    "message",
      +    "quote"
      +  ],
      +  "type": "object"
      +}
  3. First observed

TDQS

A4.2/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With annotations supplied, the description still adds real value beyond them by disclosing a hard rate limit (5 anonymous quotes per hour per IP) and the credential model for binding a quote to an account. The mutation character is already covered by readOnlyHint=false and idempotentHint=false, so the remaining gap is only the practical consequence of duplicate submissions.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Three tight sentences with no filler. The core action is front-loaded, followed by the required credential field, then the rate limit and token alternative — each sentence carries distinct, load-bearing information.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a 7-parameter mutation with full schema descriptions and an output schema, the description covers the gaps structured data can't: auth modes, required reply email, and rate limiting. An agent has everything needed to invoke it correctly without a return-value spec.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, so the baseline is 3, but the description goes further by explaining buyer_email's role (required, and the channel the seller replies to) and how X-Agent-Token changes its meaning. That added semantics is genuinely beyond the schema's terse field descriptions.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states a concrete verb+resource ("Request a bulk quote for a product") and scopes it with "(buyer tool)," which separates it from seller-side siblings like respond_to_quote and get_quote_requests. It does not name the alternative tools an agent might reach for, so the differentiation is implied rather than explicit.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

It clearly explains the two operating modes and when each applies: anonymous use (no credentials, buyer_email mandatory as the reply channel) versus an X-Agent-Token that binds the quote to a buyer account. What's missing is routing guidance against siblings such as get_quote_status or quick_buy, so it gives context but no exclusions.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

Resources