Skip to main content
Glama

tvm-fund

calculate_future_value

Read-onlyIdempotent

Calculate the future value of a single lump sum: what a present amount grows to at a given rate over a given number of periods, with compounding. Formula: FV = PV x (1 + r)^n. WHEN TO USE: Use to project what an investment or cash balance will be worth at a future date under compound growth (e.g. an invested lump sum, or a liability growing at a stated rate). WHEN NOT TO USE: Do NOT use for a series of multiple, uneven cash flows — this tool compounds a single present amount. For level periodic payment streams use the annuity tool, or when you need the required starting amount (use calculate_present_value). BEHAVIOUR: pure deterministic calculation — no side effects, no network or storage access; idempotent and non-destructive; identical inputs always produce identical outputs. Division by zero, non-finite inputs, or mathematically undefined combinations return an explicit error instead of a number. RETURNS: JSON object { future_value: number (currency), inputs }. PARAMETERS: present_value (required): Starting amount in currency units, e.g. 100000. May be negative for a liability. rate (required): Periodic rate as a decimal, e.g. 0.08 = 8% per period (never pass percentage points). Rate and periods must share frequency (annual/annual or monthly/monthly). periods (required): Number of compounding periods, e.g. 5. Must be >= 0.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
rateYesPeriodic rate as a decimal, e.g. 0.08 = 8% per period (never pass percentage points). Rate and periods must share frequency (annual/annual or monthly/monthly).
periodsYesNumber of compounding periods, e.g. 5. Must be >= 0.
present_valueYesStarting amount in currency units, e.g. 100000. May be negative for a liability.

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. First observed

TDQS

A4.8/5.0
Behavior5/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Beyond the annotations (readOnly, idempotent, non-destructive), the description discloses that it is a pure deterministic calculation with no side effects, network, or storage access, and that invalid inputs return explicit errors. No contradiction with annotations; it reinforces them with concrete detail.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is longer than strictly necessary because the PARAMETERS section largely duplicates the input schema. However, it is well-structured with labeled sections, front-loads the core definition and formula, and the added length is purposeful for avoiding rate-unit mistakes.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple three-parameter deterministic calculation with no output schema, the description is complete: it states the return shape ({ future_value, inputs }), covers edge cases (division by zero, non-finite inputs, undefined combinations), and specifies parameter constraints. Nothing needed to call it correctly is missing.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, so the baseline is 3. The description repeats much of the schema's parameter documentation, but it adds the formula, which clarifies the algebraic relationship among present_value, rate, and periods, and gives worked examples for each parameter.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description opens with a specific verb and resource—'Calculate the future value of a single lump sum'—and includes the formula FV = PV x (1 + r)^n. It also distinguishes itself from sibling tools by explicitly saying it compounds a single present amount, not a cash-flow series.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Dedicated WHEN TO USE and WHEN NOT TO USE sections give explicit conditions, including excluded use cases (multiple uneven cash flows) and the correct alternatives (annuity tool, calculate_present_value). It also specifies the rate/period frequency matching requirement.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

Resources