Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema coverage is 100%, so the schema already documents `kind`, `chain`, and `limit`. The description adds meaningful semantic gloss by translating each arbitrage category into plain-language concepts (e.g., 'flash-loan-fundable routes' for flashloan), which helps an agent pick the right enum value. It does not add extra semantics for chain or limit, but 100% coverage keeps this strong.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.