Agent Einstein — Crypto & Market Intelligence

Copy Trading Intelligence

analyze_copy_trading

Read-onlyIdempotent

The ranked leaderboard of profitable wallets worth following, or a deeper intelligence read on a specific trader’s edge, consistency and risk. [Paid: $0.85–$1.00 per call from your Einstein credit balance. Free alternatives exist for several of these — see list_einstein_capabilities.]

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema

Name	Required	Description	Default
`kind`	No	leaderboard · intel (needs `walletAddress`).	leaderboard
`limit`	No	Maximum results (1-100).
`walletAddress`	No	Trader wallet, for `intel`.

Output Schema

TableJSON Schema

Name	Required	Description
`skill`	No	Which Einstein capability answered. These tools route onto one of many skills by an enum argument, so this names the branch that actually ran.
`reason`	No	Why there is no analysis, when `available` is false.
`analysis`	No	The written answer, identical to the result's text block. This is the field to read: the rest of the payload is whichever capability answered, and its shape varies by tool and by argument.
`available`	No	True when the analysis ran. False when it did not — no capability matched the arguments, the caller is out of credit, billing was unavailable, or the skill produced nothing. NOT a statement about the market.

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

Changed1 schema field changedSep 4, 2026

changedOutput schema / (root)

Previous value: -nullNew value: +{
+  "additionalProperties": true,
+  "properties": {
+    "analysis": {
+      "description": "The written answer, identical to the result's text block. This is the field to read: the rest of the payload is whichever capability answered, and its shape varies by tool and by argument.",
+      "type": "string"
+    },
+    "available": {
+      "description": "True when the analysis ran. False when it did not — no capability matched the arguments, the caller is out of credit, billing was unavailable, or the skill produced nothing. NOT a statement about the market.",
+      "type": "boolean"
+    },
+    "reason": {
+      "description": "Why there is no analysis, when `available` is false.",
+      "type": "string"
+    },
+    "skill": {
+      "description": "Which Einstein capability answered. These tools route onto one of many skills by an enum argument, so this names the branch that actually ran.",
+      "type": "string"
+    }
+  },
+  "type": "object"
+}

AddedAug 17, 2026

TDQS

A3.9/5.0

Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint=true, idempotentHint=true, and destructiveHint=false, so the description is not burdened with covering basic safety. It adds valuable behavioral context about paid usage and the exact price range from the user's credit balance. This cost disclosure goes beyond what annotations and the schema provide.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is compact, front-loaded with the tool's core function, and includes only the essential cost caveat. The sentence structure efficiently conveys both modes and the paid nature without extraneous words.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the parameter schema fully documents all fields, an output schema exists, and annotations cover read-only/idempotent behavior, the description is complete enough for correct invocation. The cost and mode guidance further round out the context. A minor gap is not explicitly describing what the intel output contains, but the output schema likely covers that.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, with all three parameters already documented including the enum values, default for limit, and the walletAddress requirement for 'intel'. The description adds little semantic detail beyond what the schema provides, so the baseline of 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly identifies the tool as providing either a ranked leaderboard of profitable copy-trading wallets or deeper intelligence on a specific trader's edge, consistency, and risk. It is specific about the resource and output modes, and although it lacks an explicit verb, the meaning is unambiguous. The 'copy trading' focus helps distinguish it from broader whale-tracking or wallet-analysis siblings.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description explains the two modes ('leaderboard' for general rankings, 'intel' for a specific trader) and includes a practical cost note. It directs users to list_einstein_capabilities for free alternatives, which is useful decision guidance. It does not name specific sibling tools or conditions for choosing between them, but the mode breakdown effectively tells the agent when to use each variant.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

All Agent Einstein — Crypto & Market Intelligence tools Inspect

Try in Browser

One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.