Skip to main content
Glama

stop_site_audit

Stop a client's running SEO audit crawl. What it requested so far is analysed and kept (a stopped crawl is reported as stopped, its health over the pages it reached); the pages it did not request go back to the allowance. Without confirm:true it returns a preview.

Tool call template

Replace each placeholder with a value matching the input schema. Only required parameters are included; add optional parameters as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {
      "clientId": "<clientId>"
    },
    "name": "stop_site_audit"
  }
}

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
confirmNotrue stops the crawl. Omit to preview. With confirm:true, also pass the preview's previewToken.
clientIdYesClient id (from list_clients).
previewTokenNoWith confirm:true: the previewToken from this tool's preview (valid 15 minutes, once, for exactly the previewed arguments).

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Added

TDQS

A4.2/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations only declare the safety flags; the description adds meaningful outcome semantics the annotations cannot convey — partial results are analysed and retained, unreached pages return to the allowance, and status reads as stopped. It omits error/no-active-crawl behavior and permission requirements.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two sentences, front-loaded with the action, then the retention consequence and the preview caveat. No filler and nothing repeated.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a 3-parameter mutation with no output schema, the description supplies the retained/discarded outcome an agent needs to predict results. Missing only edge cases such as stopping when no crawl exists and the error surface.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% and the description's mention of confirm:true merely restates what the schema already documents, including the previewToken flow. Baseline 3 applies since the schema carries parameter meaning.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific verb and resource ('Stop a client's running SEO audit crawl') with clear scope, distinguishing it from run_site_audit and create_site_audit_task without ambiguity.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Explains the two-step safe-call pattern ('Without confirm:true it returns a preview'), which tells the agent how to invoke it safely. It does not name alternatives or say what to do when no crawl is running, leaving a modest gap.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

Resources