Skip to main content
Glama

Get Permissions for a Resource Kind

get_permissions
Read-onlyIdempotent

The permission names a policy may grant on one resource kind (for example reveal on secret, exec on workload). Call it before create_policy or update_policy when a name is uncertain.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
orgNoOrganization slug.
kindYesResource kind to get permissions for

Output Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
okYes
dataNoThe full result. Read this, not only the summary.
detailsNo
summaryYes
nextStepsNo

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed14 schema fields changed
    • removedInput schema / $schema
      Removed value: -"http://json-schema.org/draft-07/schema#"
    • removedInput schema / additionalProperties
      Removed value: -false
    • changedInput schema / properties / org / description
      Previous value: -"Organization slug (lowercase kebab-case). NEVER guess — if the user has not named one, ask. On org-not-found, stop and ask; do not retry variants."New value: +"Organization slug."
    • removedInput schema / properties / org / maxLength
      Removed value: -63
    • removedInput schema / properties / org / minLength
      Removed value: -1
    • removedInput schema / properties / org / pattern
      Removed value: -"^[a-z0-9]([a-z0-9-]{0,61}[a-z0-9])?$"
    • changedInput schema / required
      Previous value: -[
      -  "org",
      -  "kind"
      -]New value: +[
      +  "kind"
      +]
    • removedOutput schema / $schema
      Removed value: -"http://json-schema.org/draft-07/schema#"
    • removedOutput schema / additionalProperties
      Removed value: -false
    • changedOutput schema / properties / data / description
      Previous value: -"The full machine-readable result — list rows, the resource object, query results. Read THIS, not just the summary."New value: +"The full result. Read this, not only the summary."
    • addedOutput schema / properties / details
      Added value: +{
      +  "type": "string"
      +}
    • removedOutput schema / properties / nextSteps / description
      Removed value: -"Recommended follow-up actions for this task, in order."
    • removedOutput schema / properties / ok / description
      Removed value: -"Whether the call succeeded."
    • removedOutput schema / properties / summary / description
      Removed value: -"One-line summary of the result."
  2. First observed

TDQS

A3.8/5.0
Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already state readOnlyHint=true, idempotentHint=true, destructiveHint=false, and openWorldHint=false. The description adds a usage recommendation and examples, but no additional behavioral traits such as return behavior or permission requirements beyond what annotations and output schema provide.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two tightly written sentences, front-loaded with what the tool returns and followed by when to use it. No filler or redundant restatement.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple read-only lookup with a complete input schema and an output schema, the description supplies sufficient purpose and usage context. It could more explicitly state that it returns the list of permission names, but nothing critical is missing.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so the schema already documents both parameters. The description adds examples of permission names for certain resource kinds, but does not clarify the org parameter or add syntax details beyond the schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states what is returned: permission names a policy may grant for one resource kind, with concrete examples. It is clear but not framed as a direct verb+resource action, relying on the title and context to fully disambiguate.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

It explicitly says to call it before create_policy or update_policy when a permission name is uncertain, giving a clear usage condition. It does not specify when not to use it or name a direct alternative lookup tool.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.