Control Plane

Clear TLS on a Domain Listener

clear_domain_tls

DestructiveIdempotent

Remove the TLS configuration from a port listener; the listener reverts to platform defaults. NOTE: on 443 with http/http2 the platform re-injects a default TLS block — TLS cannot be disabled there, only reset.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema

Name	Required	Description
`org`	No	Organization slug.
`domain`	Yes	Fully qualified domain name.
`portNumber`	Yes	Existing listener port number to target.

Output Schema

TableJSON Schema

Name	Required	Description
`ok`	Yes
`data`	No	The full result. Read this, not only the summary.
`details`	No
`summary`	Yes
`nextSteps`	No

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

Changed15 schema fields changedSep 30, 2026

removedInput schema / $schema

Removed value: -"http://json-schema.org/draft-07/schema#"

removedInput schema / additionalProperties
```
Removed value: -false
```
removedInput schema / properties / domain / minLength
```
Removed value: -1
```

changedInput schema / properties / org / description

Previous value: -"Organization slug (lowercase kebab-case). NEVER guess — if the user has not named one, ask. On org-not-found, stop and ask; do not retry variants."New value: +"Organization slug."

removedInput schema / properties / org / maxLength
```
Removed value: -63
```
removedInput schema / properties / org / minLength
```
Removed value: -1
```

removedInput schema / properties / org / pattern

Removed value: -"^[a-z0-9]([a-z0-9-]{0,61}[a-z0-9])?$"

changedInput schema / required

Previous value: -[
-  "org",
-  "domain",
-  "portNumber"
-]New value: +[
+  "domain",
+  "portNumber"
+]

removedOutput schema / $schema

Removed value: -"http://json-schema.org/draft-07/schema#"

removedOutput schema / additionalProperties
```
Removed value: -false
```

changedOutput schema / properties / data / description

Previous value: -"The full machine-readable result — list rows, the resource object, query results. Read THIS, not just the summary."New value: +"The full result. Read this, not only the summary."

addedOutput schema / properties / details
```
Added value: +{
+  "type": "string"
+}
```

removedOutput schema / properties / nextSteps / description

Removed value: -"Recommended follow-up actions for this task, in order."

removedOutput schema / properties / ok / description
```
Removed value: -"Whether the call succeeded."
```
removedOutput schema / properties / summary / description
```
Removed value: -"One-line summary of the result."
```

First observedJun 28, 2026

TDQS

A3.8/5.0

Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare destructiveHint=true and idempotentHint=true, but the description adds real value beyond them: the listener reverts to platform defaults, and on 443 the platform re-injects a default TLS block so TLS cannot truly be disabled. That is concrete post-condition behavior the annotations cannot convey.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two sentences, the core action front-loaded and the critical exception immediately after. Every clause earns its place with no redundancy.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

An output schema exists, so return values need not be described, and the destructive nature plus the 443 edge case are covered. Auth/permission requirements are the only material omission for a mutating operation.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so the parameters are already fully documented. The description's reference to a 'port listener' and the 443 case adds contextual meaning to portNumber, but it introduces no syntax or format detail beyond the schema. Baseline 3 is correct.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific verb and resource: 'Remove the TLS configuration from a port listener.' The follow-on clause specifies the resulting state ('reverts to platform defaults'), so the agent knows exactly what the call does. It does not name its natural counterpart set_domain_tls, so the sibling differentiation is only implicit.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines3/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The NOTE gives an important usage constraint (on 443 with http/http2 TLS can only be reset, not disabled), which steers an agent away from a doomed request. However, it never states the general condition for choosing this tool over set_domain_tls or remove_domain_port, so routing guidance is only implied.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

All Control Plane tools Inspect

Try in Browser

One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.