Skip to main content
Glama

Costory: Your Finops MCP

list_users

Read-only

List organization members so you can share a dashboard, report, budget, or cost alert with a person. Use when the user asks who is in the organization or needs a person to grant access to. Returns id, name, and email. Optional query filters by first name, last name, or email; omit it to list up to 100 members. Use the returned id as userId on set_object_permissions USER grants. You do not need to share a team with someone to list or share with them.

Tool call template

Replace each placeholder with a value matching the input schema. Only required parameters are included; add optional parameters as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {
      "context": "<context>"
    },
    "name": "list_users"
  }
}

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
slugNoOrganization slug. Omit to auto-detect from your account (fails if you belong to multiple orgs).
queryNoOptional name or email search. Omit to list up to 100 organization members.
contextYesA few words on why you are calling this tool, for the server developer's analytics. Describe people and things by role, such as "a customer". Do not quote the user or include names, emails, or other personal details.
llm_modelNoThe model identifier you are running as, for example "claude-opus-4-8" or "gpt-5.2". Pass "unknown" if you are not certain. Recorded for the server developer's analytics.
conversation_idNoThe conversation_id this server returned earlier in this conversation, unchanged, including after later user messages. Omit it if you have none. Recorded for the server developer's analytics.

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed2 schema fields changed
    • changedInput schema / properties / context / description
      Previous value: -"Explain in 15-25 words, in third person, why this tool is called and how it supports the user's goal. For analytics only. You MUST describe only the abstract purpose of the tool call. NEVER include, repeat, paraphrase, or infer personal, sensitive, or identifying information from the user request or tool results, including names, emails, phone numbers, IPs, IDs, or credentials. You MUST generalize specific entities into roles such as \"a user\", \"the customer\", or \"an account\". Example: \"Retrieving a customer's recent orders to investigate a billing issue and help support determine the appropriate resolution.\""New value: +"A few words on why you are calling this tool, for the server developer's analytics. Describe people and things by role, such as \"a customer\". Do not quote the user or include names, emails, or other personal details."
    • changedInput schema / required
      Previous value: -[
      -  "context",
      -  "llm_model"
      -]New value: +[
      +  "context"
      +]
  2. Changed4 schema fields changed
    • addedInput schema / properties / context
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "Explain in 15-25 words, in third person, why this tool is called and how it supports the user's goal. For analytics only. You MUST describe only the abstract purpose of the tool call. NEVER include, repeat, paraphrase, or infer personal, sensitive, or identifying information from the user request or tool results, including names, emails, phone numbers, IPs, IDs, or credentials. You MUST generalize specific entities into roles such as \"a user\", \"the customer\", or \"an account\". Example: \"Retrieving a customer's recent orders to investigate a billing issue and help support determine the appropriate resolution.\"",
      +  "type": "string"
      +}
    • addedInput schema / properties / conversation_id
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "The conversation_id this server returned earlier in this conversation, unchanged, including after later user messages. Omit it if you have none. Recorded for the server developer's analytics.",
      +  "type": "string"
      +}
    • addedInput schema / properties / llm_model
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "The model identifier you are running as, for example \"claude-opus-4-8\" or \"gpt-5.2\". Pass \"unknown\" if you are not certain. Recorded for the server developer's analytics.",
      +  "type": "string"
      +}
    • addedInput schema / required
      Added value: +[
      +  "context",
      +  "llm_model"
      +]
  3. Added

TDQS

A4.4/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint=true, destructiveHint=false, openWorldHint=false, so safety is covered; the description adds genuinely non-obvious behavior: the 100-member cap when query is omitted, the specific returned fields, and the permission prerequisite note that team sharing is not required. It omits pagination or what happens beyond 100 members, which is the one behavioral gap that matters for a capped list.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Front-loaded with purpose, then usage, then return shape, then parameter behavior, then a caveat — a sensible ordering with no wasted sentences. The first two sentences overlap somewhat in restating the sharing intent ('share a dashboard... with a person' / 'needs a person to grant access to'), a minor redundancy.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

There is no output schema, and the description compensates by naming the returned fields (id, name, email). All five parameters are covered by the schema, and the description adds the cross-tool linkage to set_object_permissions, so an agent has everything needed to call this correctly and use the result.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, so the baseline is 3. The description still adds meaning beyond the schema by specifying that query matches first name, last name, or email, and by tying the omit-case to a 100-member limit rather than leaving the default behavior implicit. It says nothing about slug auto-detection, but the schema already handles that.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific verb and resource ('List organization members') and immediately frames the resource as people, not teams, noting 'You do not need to share a team with someone to list or share with them.' That sentence alone separates it from the list_teams sibling without requiring the agent to open either schema.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Gives two concrete triggering conditions ('when the user asks who is in the organization or needs a person to grant access to') and names the downstream tool and field mapping (set_object_permissions USER grants with the returned id). It does not explicitly exclude or redirect to siblings such as list_teams or list_organizations, so it stops short of a full when/when-not statement.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

Resources