Skip to main content
Glama

Costory: Your Finops MCP

get_documentation_page

Read-only

Retrieve the full content of a specific Costory documentation page by its public docs URL or page path. Use this after search_documentation returns results. Response starts with Url: https://docs.costory.io/.... When citing this page in chat, use that exact Url: as the markdown href — do not convert to a relative app path. EXAMPLE: "Show me the full page about cost explorer" → { page: "https://docs.costory.io/features/cost-explorer" }

Tool call template

Replace each placeholder with a value matching the input schema. Only required parameters are included; add optional parameters as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {
      "page": "<page>",
      "context": "<context>"
    },
    "name": "get_documentation_page"
  }
}

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
pageYesDocumentation page URL or path from search results (e.g. 'https://docs.costory.io/get-started/welcome' or 'features/cost-explorer')
contextYesA few words on why you are calling this tool, for the server developer's analytics. Describe people and things by role, such as "a customer". Do not quote the user or include names, emails, or other personal details.
llm_modelNoThe model identifier you are running as, for example "claude-opus-4-8" or "gpt-5.2". Pass "unknown" if you are not certain. Recorded for the server developer's analytics.
conversation_idNoThe conversation_id this server returned earlier in this conversation, unchanged, including after later user messages. Omit it if you have none. Recorded for the server developer's analytics.

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed2 schema fields changed
    • changedInput schema / properties / context / description
      Previous value: -"Explain in 15-25 words, in third person, why this tool is called and how it supports the user's goal. For analytics only. You MUST describe only the abstract purpose of the tool call. NEVER include, repeat, paraphrase, or infer personal, sensitive, or identifying information from the user request or tool results, including names, emails, phone numbers, IPs, IDs, or credentials. You MUST generalize specific entities into roles such as \"a user\", \"the customer\", or \"an account\". Example: \"Retrieving a customer's recent orders to investigate a billing issue and help support determine the appropriate resolution.\""New value: +"A few words on why you are calling this tool, for the server developer's analytics. Describe people and things by role, such as \"a customer\". Do not quote the user or include names, emails, or other personal details."
    • changedInput schema / required
      Previous value: -[
      -  "page",
      -  "context",
      -  "llm_model"
      -]New value: +[
      +  "page",
      +  "context"
      +]
  2. Changed4 schema fields changed
    • addedInput schema / properties / context
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "Explain in 15-25 words, in third person, why this tool is called and how it supports the user's goal. For analytics only. You MUST describe only the abstract purpose of the tool call. NEVER include, repeat, paraphrase, or infer personal, sensitive, or identifying information from the user request or tool results, including names, emails, phone numbers, IPs, IDs, or credentials. You MUST generalize specific entities into roles such as \"a user\", \"the customer\", or \"an account\". Example: \"Retrieving a customer's recent orders to investigate a billing issue and help support determine the appropriate resolution.\"",
      +  "type": "string"
      +}
    • addedInput schema / properties / conversation_id
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "The conversation_id this server returned earlier in this conversation, unchanged, including after later user messages. Omit it if you have none. Recorded for the server developer's analytics.",
      +  "type": "string"
      +}
    • addedInput schema / properties / llm_model
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "The model identifier you are running as, for example \"claude-opus-4-8\" or \"gpt-5.2\". Pass \"unknown\" if you are not certain. Recorded for the server developer's analytics.",
      +  "type": "string"
      +}
    • changedInput schema / required
      Previous value: -[
      -  "page"
      -]New value: +[
      +  "page",
      +  "context",
      +  "llm_model"
      +]
  3. First observed

TDQS

A4.4/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already show that this is a safe, read-only operation with no side effects and no open-world access. Beyond that, the description adds real behavioral detail: the response starts with a `Url:` line, and that exact URL must be reused as the citation href rather than converted to a relative app path. This is useful output-format and usage context that the annotations do not provide.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is short and front-loaded: the core purpose comes first, then the sequencing guidance, then the citation rule, then an example. No sentence is wasted, and the example earns its place by making the `page` value concrete.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple read-only fetch tool, the definition covers the purpose, when to use it, the page-format edge case, and the citation rules for the returned URL. The one remaining gap is that it does not say what the page content looks like beyond the leading `Url:` line, but the annotations and the single-purpose nature of the tool make that gap minor.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so all four parameters are already documented in the schema. The description adds only a concrete example of the `page` format, which the schema also includes, and says nothing about `context`, `llm_model`, or `conversation_id`. With the schema doing the heavy lifting, a baseline 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description uses a specific verb+resource combination: 'Retrieve the full content of a specific Costory documentation page by its public docs URL or page path.' This clearly distinguishes it from the sibling tool search_documentation, which returns search results rather than a full page.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description names the alternative and the condition for using it: 'Use this after search_documentation returns results.' The included example maps a concrete user request to the correct page value, which removes any doubt about when and how to invoke it.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

Resources