Skip to main content
Glama

intel

by io.chainhelix
OverviewDiscussionsAdmin

wall_map

Requires a ChainHelix API key as bearer token, or 2 cents per call paid over Binance b402 in USDT, USDC, USD1 or U on BNB Smart Chain, or over x402 in USDC on the Base network. Support and resistance price walls per chain with touch counts, from hourly to weekly market structure, the same wall map the ChainHelix engine trades with. Omit chain for all nine

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
chainNo

Output Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
metaNo
receiptNo
resultsYes

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed1 schema field changed
    • changedInput schema / x-lexicon / bundleSha256
      Previous value: -"a1c2e10fd3177d6b4d59ca78693e8fb36880165cf0f735f680dd86a510411178"New value: +"e5b4290024a229f2bdf97f8fc6a0079c3fe13b77267f41fdcffeb8b26aa1c41e"
  2. Changed1 schema field changed
    • changedInput schema / x-lexicon / bundleSha256
      Previous value: -"1eeb782ee15fe69fc80776948e0556fa6b795e210e6305935b2c97b73d955cda"New value: +"a1c2e10fd3177d6b4d59ca78693e8fb36880165cf0f735f680dd86a510411178"
  3. Changed1 schema field changed
    • changedInput schema / x-lexicon / bundleSha256
      Previous value: -"c014292cad7497ce9fd68c33345ac32cb42b672c8e77d6c749c26e162cc207e4"New value: +"1eeb782ee15fe69fc80776948e0556fa6b795e210e6305935b2c97b73d955cda"
  4. Changed2 schema fields changed
    • addedInput schema / x-lexicon
      Added value: +{
+  "bundleSha256": "c014292cad7497ce9fd68c33345ac32cb42b672c8e77d6c749c26e162cc207e4",
+  "name": "ChainHelix Agentic Lexicon",
+  "resolve": "lexicon_resolve",
+  "spec": "lexicon_spec",
+  "version": "0.1.0"
+}
    • addedInput schema / x-vocab
      Added value: +{
+  "chain": "onchain.chain"
+}
  5. Changed4 schema fields changed
    • addedOutput schema / properties / meta
      Added value: +{
+  "additionalProperties": false,
+  "properties": {
+    "contentHash": {
+      "type": "string"
+    },
+    "generated": {
+      "type": "number"
+    },
+    "priceUsd": {
+      "type": "number"
+    },
+    "validUntil": {
+      "type": "number"
+    }
+  },
+  "type": "object"
+}
    • addedOutput schema / properties / receipt
      Added value: +{
+  "additionalProperties": false,
+  "properties": {
+    "bytes": {
+      "type": "number"
+    },
+    "covers": {
+      "type": "string"
+    },
+    "issuedAt": {
+      "type": "number"
+    },
+    "lookup": {
+      "type": "string"
+    },
+    "network": {
+      "type": [
+        "string",
+        "null"
+      ]
+    },
+    "nonce": {
+      "type": "string"
+    },
+    "seq": {
+      "type": "number"
+    },
+    "settleTx": {
+      "type": [
+        "string",
+        "null"
+      ]
+    },
+    "sha256": {
+      "type": "string"
+    },
+    "tool": {
+      "type": [
+        "string",
+        "null"
+      ]
+    }
+  },
+  "type": "object"
+}
    • addedOutput schema / properties / results / items / properties / asOf
      Added value: +{
+  "type": [
+    "number",
+    "null"
+  ]
+}
    • addedOutput schema / properties / results / items / properties / source
      Added value: +{
+  "type": "string"
+}
  6. Added

TDQS

B3.2/5.0
Behavior2/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries the full burden. It discloses the payment/auth requirement (bearer token or per-call payment) and the data scope (per chain, touch counts, hourly to weekly). However, it doesn't disclose what the output looks like, whether it's a read-only operation, rate limits, or what happens if the chain is invalid. The payment requirement is useful but the behavioral profile is incomplete.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness3/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single dense paragraph that front-loads payment details before the actual purpose. The payment/auth information is important but takes up most of the text, pushing the core functionality ('support and resistance price walls per chain') to the middle. It's not overly long, but the structure could be improved by leading with the tool's purpose.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness3/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool has an output schema and only one optional parameter, the description covers the essential input semantics. However, it lacks information about the output structure (though the output schema exists), and the payment requirement is unusual enough that more detail on how to pay or what '2 cents per call' means in practice would be helpful. The description is adequate but not complete for an agent that needs to decide whether to call this tool.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%, so the description must compensate. It explains the 'chain' parameter implicitly by listing the nine chains in the enum and saying 'Omit chain for all nine'. This adds meaning beyond the raw enum by clarifying that omitting the parameter returns all chains. However, it doesn't describe the format or semantics of each chain value beyond the enum.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states a specific resource ('support and resistance price walls per chain') and a clear verb ('requires...' is not the verb, but 'Omit chain for all nine' implies retrieval). It distinguishes itself from siblings by mentioning 'the same wall map the ChainHelix engine trades with' and 'per chain with touch counts, from hourly to weekly market structure'. However, it doesn't use an explicit verb like 'get' or 'list', and the primary focus is on payment/auth requirements rather than a crisp action statement.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines3/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies usage context: it's a market-structure tool for support/resistance walls, and 'Omit chain for all nine' gives a usage hint. But it doesn't explicitly state when to use this tool vs alternatives like candles, market_state, or instrument_signals, nor does it mention any exclusions or prerequisites beyond payment.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

All intel toolsInspect
Try in Browser
One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

Resources