Skip to main content
Glama

intel

by io.chainhelix
OverviewDiscussionsAdmin

stablecoin_flows

Requires a ChainHelix API key as bearer token, or 2 cents per call paid over Binance b402 in USDT, USDC, USD1 or U on BNB Smart Chain, or over x402 in USDC on the Base network. Stablecoin mints and burns per chain and coin over a window: counts, total dollars, large events, and the net of mints minus burns. window in hours, default 24, max 720. Omit chain for all Chains covered: ethereum, bnb, avalanche, polygon.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
chainNo
windowNo

Output Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
metaNo
receiptNo
resultsYes

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed1 schema field changed
    • changedInput schema / x-lexicon / bundleSha256
      Previous value: -"a1c2e10fd3177d6b4d59ca78693e8fb36880165cf0f735f680dd86a510411178"New value: +"e5b4290024a229f2bdf97f8fc6a0079c3fe13b77267f41fdcffeb8b26aa1c41e"
  2. Changed1 schema field changed
    • changedInput schema / x-lexicon / bundleSha256
      Previous value: -"1eeb782ee15fe69fc80776948e0556fa6b795e210e6305935b2c97b73d955cda"New value: +"a1c2e10fd3177d6b4d59ca78693e8fb36880165cf0f735f680dd86a510411178"
  3. Changed1 schema field changed
    • changedInput schema / x-lexicon / bundleSha256
      Previous value: -"c014292cad7497ce9fd68c33345ac32cb42b672c8e77d6c749c26e162cc207e4"New value: +"1eeb782ee15fe69fc80776948e0556fa6b795e210e6305935b2c97b73d955cda"
  4. Changed2 schema fields changed
    • addedInput schema / x-lexicon
      Added value: +{
+  "bundleSha256": "c014292cad7497ce9fd68c33345ac32cb42b672c8e77d6c749c26e162cc207e4",
+  "name": "ChainHelix Agentic Lexicon",
+  "resolve": "lexicon_resolve",
+  "spec": "lexicon_spec",
+  "version": "0.1.0"
+}
    • addedInput schema / x-vocab
      Added value: +{
+  "chain": "onchain.chain",
+  "window": "market.window"
+}
  5. Changed1 schema field changed
    • changedInput schema / properties / chain / enum
      Previous value: -[
-  "bitcoin",
-  "ethereum",
-  "bnb",
-  "solana",
-  "avalanche",
-  "xrp",
-  "tron",
-  "polygon",
-  "sui"
-]New value: +[
+  "ethereum",
+  "bnb",
+  "avalanche",
+  "polygon"
+]
  6. Changed4 schema fields changed
    • addedOutput schema / properties / meta
      Added value: +{
+  "additionalProperties": false,
+  "properties": {
+    "contentHash": {
+      "type": "string"
+    },
+    "generated": {
+      "type": "number"
+    },
+    "priceUsd": {
+      "type": "number"
+    },
+    "validUntil": {
+      "type": "number"
+    }
+  },
+  "type": "object"
+}
    • addedOutput schema / properties / receipt
      Added value: +{
+  "additionalProperties": false,
+  "properties": {
+    "bytes": {
+      "type": "number"
+    },
+    "covers": {
+      "type": "string"
+    },
+    "issuedAt": {
+      "type": "number"
+    },
+    "lookup": {
+      "type": "string"
+    },
+    "network": {
+      "type": [
+        "string",
+        "null"
+      ]
+    },
+    "nonce": {
+      "type": "string"
+    },
+    "seq": {
+      "type": "number"
+    },
+    "settleTx": {
+      "type": [
+        "string",
+        "null"
+      ]
+    },
+    "sha256": {
+      "type": "string"
+    },
+    "tool": {
+      "type": [
+        "string",
+        "null"
+      ]
+    }
+  },
+  "type": "object"
+}
    • addedOutput schema / properties / results / items / properties / latestAt
      Added value: +{
+  "type": [
+    "number",
+    "null"
+  ]
+}
    • addedOutput schema / properties / results / items / properties / source
      Added value: +{
+  "type": "string"
+}
  7. Added

TDQS

A3.7/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description carries the full behavioral burden. It discloses the payment/auth requirement, the scope of the data returned, the window constraints, and chain filtering behavior. This is unusually transparent for a read tool, though it does not mention rate limits or latency.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness3/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is reasonably compact, but the core purpose sentence is not front-loaded; payment/access details come first, pushing the actual function of the tool to the second sentence. Despite that, every sentence carries necessary information and there is no redundancy.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a two-parameter tool with an output schema, the description covers authentication, cost, parameter semantics, defaults, and enumeration. The only minor gap is the implied 'coin' dimension in the output, which is not explained as a filterable input, but the output schema likely covers the return structure.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 0%, so the description must compensate. It explains the 'window' unit and bounds (hours, default 24, max 720), and clarifies 'chain' by listing valid values and the omit-for-all behavior. This goes well beyond the bare schema, which only has an enum and a number type.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly identifies the resource and outcome: 'Stablecoin mints and burns per chain and coin over a window' with counts, total dollars, large events, and net. It does not explicitly distinguish itself from siblings like bridge_flows or whale_flows, but the stablecoin-specific subject matter makes the purpose evident.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines3/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description gives practical usage context: authentication via API key, cost per call, and parameter defaults ('default 24, max 720' for window). It also explains the 'omit chain' behavior, but it never states when to prefer this tool over related flow tools or any exclusions, so usage guidance is implied rather than explicit.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

All intel toolsInspect
Try in Browser
One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

Resources