intel

attest

5 cents per call paid over Binance b402 in USDT, USDC, USD1 or U on BNB Smart Chain, or over x402 in USDC on the Base network. A ChainHelix API key does not cover this tool. Seal any claim on chain now, reveal it later, a track record nobody can backdate. Send your claim as the payload string with an optional revealDelayHours from 1 to 720, default 72. Your identity is your paying wallet, or your key id. ChainHelix seals the exact time of your commitment on the opBNB chain; the claim text and salt publish automatically at reveal time. This attests WHEN you said it, never whether it is true. Verification spec: the free attest_spec tool

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema

Name	Required	Description	Default
`payload`	Yes
`revealDelayHours`	No

Output Schema

TableJSON Schema

Name	Required	Description	Default
`seq`	No
`hash`	No
`note`	No
`error`	No
`status`	No
`tenant`	No
`receipt`	No
`revealAt`	No
`committedAt`	No
`revealDelayHours`	No

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

Changed1 schema field changedSep 21, 2026

changedInput schema / x-lexicon / bundleSha256

Previous value: -"a1c2e10fd3177d6b4d59ca78693e8fb36880165cf0f735f680dd86a510411178"New value: +"e5b4290024a229f2bdf97f8fc6a0079c3fe13b77267f41fdcffeb8b26aa1c41e"

Changed1 schema field changedSep 19, 2026

changedInput schema / x-lexicon / bundleSha256

Previous value: -"1eeb782ee15fe69fc80776948e0556fa6b795e210e6305935b2c97b73d955cda"New value: +"a1c2e10fd3177d6b4d59ca78693e8fb36880165cf0f735f680dd86a510411178"

Changed1 schema field changedSep 19, 2026

changedInput schema / x-lexicon / bundleSha256

Previous value: -"c014292cad7497ce9fd68c33345ac32cb42b672c8e77d6c749c26e162cc207e4"New value: +"1eeb782ee15fe69fc80776948e0556fa6b795e210e6305935b2c97b73d955cda"

Changed3 schema fields changedSep 19, 2026

addedInput schema / x-aliases

Added value: +{
+  "payload": [
+    "Payload",
+    "payloads"
+  ]
+}

addedInput schema / x-lexicon

Added value: +{
+  "bundleSha256": "c014292cad7497ce9fd68c33345ac32cb42b672c8e77d6c749c26e162cc207e4",
+  "name": "ChainHelix Agentic Lexicon",
+  "resolve": "lexicon_resolve",
+  "spec": "lexicon_spec",
+  "version": "0.1.0"
+}

addedInput schema / x-vocab

Added value: +{
+  "payload": "agent.payload",
+  "revealDelayHours": "agent.revealDelayHours"
+}

Changed1 schema field changedSep 5, 2026

addedOutput schema / properties / receipt

Added value: +{
+  "additionalProperties": false,
+  "properties": {
+    "bytes": {
+      "type": "number"
+    },
+    "covers": {
+      "type": "string"
+    },
+    "issuedAt": {
+      "type": "number"
+    },
+    "lookup": {
+      "type": "string"
+    },
+    "network": {
+      "type": [
+        "string",
+        "null"
+      ]
+    },
+    "nonce": {
+      "type": "string"
+    },
+    "seq": {
+      "type": "number"
+    },
+    "settleTx": {
+      "type": [
+        "string",
+        "null"
+      ]
+    },
+    "sha256": {
+      "type": "string"
+    },
+    "tool": {
+      "type": [
+        "string",
+        "null"
+      ]
+    }
+  },
+  "type": "object"
+}

AddedAug 8, 2026

TDQS

A4.7/5.0

Behavior5/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations provided, the description carries the full burden, and it does so thoroughly: it discloses cost, payment routes, non-coverage by API key, chain (opBNB), reveal delay behavior, identity model, and the crucial semantic that it attests when not whether. This is exceptionally transparent for a paid on-chain tool.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is dense but every sentence adds critical value: cost, access, purpose, parameters, identity, chain behavior, and verification pointer. The main weakness is that payment details precede the core purpose, so the tool's primary function is not front-loaded.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The description covers the essential context for a paid, on-chain attestation tool: how it is paid, what it does, parameter semantics, identity, chain, reveal timing, and verification path. An output schema exists, so not explaining return values is acceptable.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters5/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%, but the description compensates fully: it explains payload is the claim string and reveals revealDelayHours range (1-720) and default (72). It also clarifies that claim text and salt publish at reveal time, adding behavioral meaning to the params.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool seals a claim on-chain now and reveals it later, with a specific verb (seal/attest) and resource (claim). It differentiates from siblings by describing the pay-per-call model, the attestation mechanism, and pointing to attest_spec for verification, which helps distinguish it from verification/status tools.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description tells the agent when to use the tool (to attest a claim on-chain) and directs to attest_spec for the verification spec. However, it does not explicitly mention when not to use it or name alternatives for checking status/reveals, though sibling names imply those options.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

All intel tools Inspect

Try in Browser

One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

Resources

Need Help?