Skip to main content
Glama

ChainHelix for Machines

by io.chainhelix.mcp
OverviewDiscussionsAdmin

webhook_status

Your registered webhooks for your tenant identity (your paying wallet, or your key id), optionally narrowed to one id. Without secret each webhook shows id, active and expiry only. With the signing secret from registration, that webhook also shows its url, events, chains and watches. Never returns the secret

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
idNo
secretNo
tenantYes

Output Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
errorNo
foundYes
webhooksNo

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed1 schema field changed
    • changedInput schema / x-lexicon / bundleSha256
      Previous value: -"670f7504e3de5031beccee25a2d24e4515f68b893295f6d5b0d3a0665498b2c9"New value: +"25cc80db6d8e9eac73d47a50f7ad6333a21f1972d008a8fed0159de8bfb4b519"
  2. Changed2 schema fields changed
    • changedInput schema / x-lexicon / bundleSha256
      Previous value: -"e5b4290024a229f2bdf97f8fc6a0079c3fe13b77267f41fdcffeb8b26aa1c41e"New value: +"670f7504e3de5031beccee25a2d24e4515f68b893295f6d5b0d3a0665498b2c9"
    • changedInput schema / x-lexicon / version
      Previous value: -"0.1.0"New value: +"0.2.0"
  3. Changed1 schema field changed
    • addedInput schema / additionalProperties
      Added value: +false
  4. Changed4 schema fields changed
    • addedInput schema / properties / secret
      Added value: +{
+  "type": "string"
+}
    • addedInput schema / x-aliases / secret
      Added value: +[
+  "Secret",
+  "secrets"
+]
    • addedInput schema / x-vocab / secret
      Added value: +"common.secret"
    • addedOutput schema / properties / webhooks / items / properties / detail
      Added value: +{
+  "type": "string"
+}
  5. Changed1 schema field changed
    • changedInput schema / x-lexicon / bundleSha256
      Previous value: -"a1c2e10fd3177d6b4d59ca78693e8fb36880165cf0f735f680dd86a510411178"New value: +"e5b4290024a229f2bdf97f8fc6a0079c3fe13b77267f41fdcffeb8b26aa1c41e"
  6. Changed1 schema field changed
    • changedInput schema / x-lexicon / bundleSha256
      Previous value: -"1eeb782ee15fe69fc80776948e0556fa6b795e210e6305935b2c97b73d955cda"New value: +"a1c2e10fd3177d6b4d59ca78693e8fb36880165cf0f735f680dd86a510411178"
  7. Changed1 schema field changed
    • changedInput schema / x-lexicon / bundleSha256
      Previous value: -"c014292cad7497ce9fd68c33345ac32cb42b672c8e77d6c749c26e162cc207e4"New value: +"1eeb782ee15fe69fc80776948e0556fa6b795e210e6305935b2c97b73d955cda"
  8. Changed3 schema fields changed
    • addedInput schema / x-aliases
      Added value: +{
+  "id": [
+    "Id",
+    "ID",
+    "@id"
+  ]
+}
    • addedInput schema / x-lexicon
      Added value: +{
+  "bundleSha256": "c014292cad7497ce9fd68c33345ac32cb42b672c8e77d6c749c26e162cc207e4",
+  "name": "ChainHelix Agentic Lexicon",
+  "resolve": "lexicon_resolve",
+  "spec": "lexicon_spec",
+  "version": "0.1.0"
+}
    • addedInput schema / x-vocab
      Added value: +{
+  "id": "data.id",
+  "tenant": "agent.tenant"
+}
  9. First observed

TDQS

A3.8/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description carries the full behavioral burden and does so well: it discloses that field visibility is conditional on supplying the signing secret and that the secret itself is never returned. It does not mention error behavior for a bad secret/id or rate limits, so it falls short of a 5.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Three tightly packed sentences, front-loaded with the resource and scope, then the secret-conditional behavior. No filler, though the final fragment 'Never returns the secret' could fold more smoothly into the prior sentence.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

An output schema exists so return values need not be spelled out, yet the description still usefully characterizes the conditional redaction of fields. For a 3-parameter, no-annotation status tool the coverage is solid; only error/edge-case behavior is left unaddressed.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%, so the description must compensate, and it does: tenant is defined as the paying wallet or key id, id narrows to one webhook, and secret is the signing secret from registration. Format-level detail (id/secret syntax) is still absent, keeping it from a 5.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly identifies the resource and scope: the caller's registered webhooks for a tenant, optionally narrowed to one id. It implicitly distinguishes itself from the write siblings (webhook_register, webhook_unregister) by describing a read of existing webhooks, but it never states an explicit retrieval verb and does not name a sibling as an alternative.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines3/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Usage is implied (view your webhooks, optionally narrow to one), and the two call modes (with/without secret) give some context for how to invoke it. However there is no explicit when-to-use, no when-not-to-use, and no routing to or away from sibling tools such as webhook_register or webhook_unregister.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

All ChainHelix for Machines toolsInspect
Try in Browser
One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

Resources