Skip to main content
Glama

AudioAlpha

by io.audioalpha
OverviewDiscussionsAdmin

get_market_featured_quotes

Get the top featured quotes from crypto podcasts for a given date, ranked by relevance score.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
dateNoDate in YYYY-MM-DD format. Omit for latest.
version_infoNoWhen true, include version metadata in the response: both version_num (the revision number) and version_label (a human-readable label like "eod_utc" for the initial end-of-day build, or "revised" when a later-indexed podcast triggered a regeneration). When false (the default), neither field is included. Note: the snapshot generation "status" field is ALWAYS returned regardless of this flag.
snapshot_typeNoAsset universe to draw the snapshot from. Currently only "crypto" is available; "tradfi" is reserved for a future release. Defaults to "crypto".crypto
version_numberNoWhich revision of the snapshot to return. Each snapshot date can be re-generated multiple times (version 1, 2, 3, …). Use -1 (the default) to always get the latest authoritative version (is_latest = true). If you request a specific version that does not exist for the given date + snapshot_type, the latest version is returned instead.

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed1 schema field changed
    • changedInput schema / properties / version_info / description
      Previous value: -"When true, include version metadata in the response: both version_num (the revision number) and version_label (a human-readable label like \"eod_utc\", \"backfill\", \"revised\"). When false (the default), neither field is included."New value: +"When true, include version metadata in the response: both version_num (the revision number) and version_label (a human-readable label like \"eod_utc\" for the initial end-of-day build, or \"revised\" when a later-indexed podcast triggered a regeneration). When false (the default), neither field is included. Note: the snapshot generation \"status\" field is ALWAYS returned regardless of this flag."
  2. Changed1 schema field changed
    • changedInput schema / properties / version_info / description
      Previous value: -"When true, include the human-readable version_label (e.g. \"eod_utc\", \"backfill\", \"revised\") alongside the always-present version_num in the response. Defaults to false."New value: +"When true, include version metadata in the response: both version_num (the revision number) and version_label (a human-readable label like \"eod_utc\", \"backfill\", \"revised\"). When false (the default), neither field is included."
  3. Changed3 schema fields changed
    • addedInput schema / properties / snapshot_type
      Added value: +{
+  "default": "crypto",
+  "description": "Asset universe to draw the snapshot from. Currently only \"crypto\" is available; \"tradfi\" is reserved for a future release. Defaults to \"crypto\".",
+  "enum": [
+    "crypto",
+    "tradfi"
+  ],
+  "type": "string"
+}
    • addedInput schema / properties / version_info
      Added value: +{
+  "default": false,
+  "description": "When true, include the human-readable version_label (e.g. \"eod_utc\", \"backfill\", \"revised\") alongside the always-present version_num in the response. Defaults to false.",
+  "type": "boolean"
+}
    • addedInput schema / properties / version_number
      Added value: +{
+  "default": -1,
+  "description": "Which revision of the snapshot to return. Each snapshot date can be re-generated multiple times (version 1, 2, 3, …). Use -1 (the default) to always get the latest authoritative version (is_latest = true). If you request a specific version that does not exist for the given date + snapshot_type, the latest version is returned instead.",
+  "minimum": -1,
+  "type": "integer"
+}
  4. First observed

TDQS

A3.8/5.0
Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations provided, the description carries the full burden of behavioral disclosure. It correctly states the core behavior (a GET returning ranked quotes) and implies a read-only operation via 'Get', but it omits details like response structure, potential errors, or any caveats around the versioning parameters—though those are partly covered by the input schema.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, well-structured sentence. It leads with the verb, states the object, the qualifier, and the ranking criterion—no wasted words. This is an ideal length for a simple GET tool.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given that this is a simple read operation with a comprehensive schema (4 optional params, fully documented), the description sufficiently conveys what the tool returns. The absence of an output schema is partially mitigated by the description's mention of 'featured quotes' and 'ranked by relevance score'. It could add a little more about the response envelope, but the tool is straightforward.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so the baseline is 3. The description adds no extra meaning for the parameters (date, version_info, snapshot_type, version_number) beyond what the schema already provides. The schema is detailed and self-sufficient.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description is very specific: it names the resource ('featured quotes from crypto podcasts'), the parameter ('for a given date'), and the ranking ('ranked by relevance score'). This clearly distinguishes it from sibling tools like get_episode_quotes (per-episode) and get_ticker_featured_quotes (per-ticker).

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines3/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Usage is implied: you would use this tool when you need market-level featured quotes for a specific date. However, it does not explicitly state when to choose this over alternatives, nor does it provide the 'when-not-to-use' guidance. The agent must infer from the name and sibling list.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

All AudioAlpha toolsInspect
Try in Browser
One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

Resources