Skip to main content
Glama
Sign In

apis-io

by io.apis
OverviewDiscussionsAdmin

get_area

Read-only

One area: metadata, its dedicated site link, and a top sample of member providers (with the total). Use find_providers?area=slug for the full list, or view=full here. Results carry next: the sub-resources that exist for this entity and the exact tool call that retrieves each, computed from this record. Pass include_next=false to omit it.

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
slugYesArea slug, as find_areas returns it, e.g. "security".
viewNosummary (default, lean) or full.summary
limitNoTop members to show.
contextNoOptional: one sentence on why you are asking. Never used to rank; read only if a result is wrong.
include_nextNoSet false to omit the `next` affordance block.

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed2 schema fields changed
    • changedInput schema / properties / context / description
      Previous value: -"Optional: why you are asking. One sentence — the task you are trying to complete, or what you expect to get back. Never included in the answer and never used to rank; it is read only when a result turns out to be wrong, which is when knowing the intent is what makes the report actionable."New value: +"Optional: one sentence on why you are asking. Never used to rank; read only if a result is wrong."
    • changedInput schema / properties / view / description
      Previous value: -"summary (default) returns lean discovery records + *_count for dropped sections; full returns the whole record (use get_api / get_provider for one entity)."New value: +"summary (default, lean) or full."
  2. Changed1 schema field changed
    • addedInput schema / properties / slug / description
      Added value: +"Area slug, as find_areas returns it, e.g. \"security\"."
  3. Changed1 schema field changed
    • addedInput schema / properties / context
      Added value: +{
+  "description": "Optional: why you are asking. One sentence — the task you are trying to complete, or what you expect to get back. Never included in the answer and never used to rank; it is read only when a result turns out to be wrong, which is when knowing the intent is what makes the report actionable.",
+  "type": "string"
+}
  4. Changed1 schema field changed
    • addedInput schema / properties / include_next
      Added value: +{
+  "default": true,
+  "description": "Set false to omit the `next` affordance block.",
+  "type": "boolean"
+}
  5. Changed2 schema fields changed
    • addedInput schema / properties / limit
      Added value: +{
+  "default": 25,
+  "description": "Top members to show.",
+  "maximum": 100,
+  "minimum": 1,
+  "type": "integer"
+}
    • addedInput schema / properties / view
      Added value: +{
+  "default": "summary",
+  "description": "summary (default) returns lean discovery records + *_count for dropped sections; full returns the whole record (use get_api / get_provider for one entity).",
+  "enum": [
+    "summary",
+    "full"
+  ],
+  "type": "string"
+}
  6. Added

TDQS

A4.6/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint=true and openWorldHint=false, covering the safety profile. The description adds substantive behavior: results carry a computed `next` block mapping sub-resources to the exact tool call that retrieves each, and how to omit it. It stops short of describing pagination or error behavior, but the affordance disclosure is genuinely useful context beyond the annotations.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Front-loads the return payload, then routing guidance, then the next-block mechanics. Four sentences all carrying information, though the final sentence about include_next is slightly fragmented in flow.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

No output schema exists, yet the description fully accounts for the return shape (metadata, link, sampled providers, total, next affordance) and for routing to siblings. Given the readOnly/openWorld annotations, an agent has everything needed to call it correctly.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so baseline is 3. The description goes beyond the schema by explaining what the `next` block contains (sub-resources plus the tool call to fetch each, computed from this record), which gives include_next meaning the terse schema text ('omit the affordance block') does not.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific verb+resource ('One area') and enumerates the payload: metadata, site link, top sample of member providers plus total. It is clearly distinguishable from siblings find_areas (listing) and find_providers (full provider list), which it names explicitly.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Gives an explicit alternative and the condition that selects it: 'Use find_providers?area=slug for the full list, or view=full here.' It also states when to suppress the next block via include_next=false. An agent does not have to infer routing.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

All apis-io toolsInspect
Try in Browser
Shareable, User-Owned Context BackendPeople, applications, and agents read, write, and coordinate together in one context lake. Reach it over MCP, a CLI, a Python SDK, or REST.fulcradynamics.comAd

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

Resources