Skip to main content
Glama
Sign In

apis-io

by io.apis
OverviewDiscussionsAdmin

find_postman

Read-only

Postman collections across the catalog. Postman-format collections (by reference). Filter by q / tags / providers; include=["content"] inlines bodies. Use find_artifacts for cross-type search.

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
qNoFree text over name + description, e.g. "sms".
pageNoPage number, 1-based (default 1).
sortNoOrder: relevance (catalog order), provider, or name.
tagsNoTag slugs, e.g. ["payments"]. On providers: what the company does (see api_tags).
limitNoResults per page, 1-100 (default 25).
matchNoHow `tags` combine: any (default) or all.any
contextNoOptional: one sentence on why you are asking. Never used to rank; read only if a result is wrong.
includeNoPass ["content"] to inline each artifact's body instead of just its URL.
providersNoProvider slugs, e.g. ["stripe"].

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed6 schema fields changed
    • changedInput schema / properties / context / description
      Previous value: -"Optional: why you are asking. One sentence — the task you are trying to complete, or what you expect to get back. Never included in the answer and never used to rank; it is read only when a result turns out to be wrong, which is when knowing the intent is what makes the report actionable."New value: +"Optional: one sentence on why you are asking. Never used to rank; read only if a result is wrong."
    • changedInput schema / properties / match / description
      Previous value: -"How multiple `tags` combine: \"any\" (default, at least one) or \"all\" (every tag)."New value: +"How `tags` combine: any (default) or all."
    • changedInput schema / properties / page / description
      Previous value: -"Page number, 1-based (default 1). Use with `limit` to walk a long list."New value: +"Page number, 1-based (default 1)."
    • changedInput schema / properties / providers / description
      Previous value: -"Provider slugs to restrict results to, e.g. [\"stripe\",\"adyen\"]."New value: +"Provider slugs, e.g. [\"stripe\"]."
    • changedInput schema / properties / q / description
      Previous value: -"Free text over name + description."New value: +"Free text over name + description, e.g. \"sms\"."
    • changedInput schema / properties / tags / description
      Previous value: -"Tag slugs. On PROVIDERS this is identity — what the company says it does, from its own apis.yml. A resource or operation term (webhook, saml, order, oai-pmh) will correctly match no provider; use find_apis?tags= for those, or find_providers?api_tags= to reach companies whose APIs merely touch it."New value: +"Tag slugs, e.g. [\"payments\"]. On providers: what the company does (see api_tags)."
  2. Changed5 schema fields changed
    • addedInput schema / properties / include / description
      Added value: +"Pass [\"content\"] to inline each artifact's body instead of just its URL."
    • addedInput schema / properties / limit / description
      Added value: +"Results per page, 1-100 (default 25)."
    • addedInput schema / properties / match / description
      Added value: +"How multiple `tags` combine: \"any\" (default, at least one) or \"all\" (every tag)."
    • addedInput schema / properties / page / description
      Added value: +"Page number, 1-based (default 1). Use with `limit` to walk a long list."
    • addedInput schema / properties / providers / description
      Added value: +"Provider slugs to restrict results to, e.g. [\"stripe\",\"adyen\"]."
  3. Changed1 schema field changed
    • changedInput schema / properties / tags / description
      Previous value: -"Tag slugs. On PROVIDERS this is identity — what the company says it does, from its own apis.yml. A resource or operation term (webhook, saml, order, oai-pmh) will correctly match no provider; use find_apis?tags= for those, or api_tags below."New value: +"Tag slugs. On PROVIDERS this is identity — what the company says it does, from its own apis.yml. A resource or operation term (webhook, saml, order, oai-pmh) will correctly match no provider; use find_apis?tags= for those, or find_providers?api_tags= to reach companies whose APIs merely touch it."
  4. Changed1 schema field changed
    • addedInput schema / properties / sort
      Added value: +{
+  "description": "Order: relevance (catalog order), provider, or name.",
+  "enum": [
+    "relevance",
+    "provider",
+    "name"
+  ],
+  "type": "string"
+}
  5. Changed1 schema field changed
    • changedInput schema / properties / tags / description
      Previous value: -"Tag slugs."New value: +"Tag slugs. On PROVIDERS this is identity — what the company says it does, from its own apis.yml. A resource or operation term (webhook, saml, order, oai-pmh) will correctly match no provider; use find_apis?tags= for those, or api_tags below."
  6. Changed1 schema field changed
    • addedInput schema / properties / context
      Added value: +{
+  "description": "Optional: why you are asking. One sentence — the task you are trying to complete, or what you expect to get back. Never included in the answer and never used to rank; it is read only when a result turns out to be wrong, which is when knowing the intent is what makes the report actionable.",
+  "type": "string"
+}
  7. Added

TDQS

A3.9/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint=true and openWorldHint=false, so the safety profile is covered. The description adds genuinely non-obvious behavior: results are references (URLs) by default and bodies are only inlined when include=["content"] is passed. It does not mention pagination limits beyond what the schema implies.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Three tight sentences with the resource stated first, then filtering mechanics, then the alternative tool. No filler. It could drop the redundant restatement of 'Postman-format collections' to be fully lean.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a 9-parameter, zero-required, read-only search tool with full schema coverage and no output schema, the description covers resource scope, filtering, content inlining, and the escape hatch to find_artifacts. The main gap is disambiguation from the closely named find_collections sibling.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so the schema already documents q, tags, providers, include, sort, match, page, and limit with examples. The description restates the headline parameters (q/tags/providers/include) but adds no syntax or format detail beyond the schema. Baseline 3 applies when the schema does the heavy lifting.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States the resource precisely ('Postman collections across the catalog') and adds the key qualifier that these are Postman-format collections returned by reference. The verb is only implied via the tool name, and it does not clarify how it differs from the sibling find_collections, which is a real ambiguity in a catalog with many find_* tools.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Gives concrete filtering guidance (q / tags / providers) and explicitly routes cross-type searching to find_artifacts, which is a clear alternative with a condition. It stops short of stating when NOT to use this tool, e.g. versus find_collections or find_openapis.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

All apis-io toolsInspect
Try in Browser
Shareable, User-Owned Context BackendPeople, applications, and agents read, write, and coordinate together in one context lake. Reach it over MCP, a CLI, a Python SDK, or REST.fulcradynamics.comAd

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

Resources