apis-io

find_mcp

Read-only

MCP servers across the catalog. Model Context Protocol servers a provider offers to agents. Filter by q / tags / providers; include=["content"] inlines bodies. Use find_artifacts for cross-type search.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema

Name	Required	Description	Default
`q`	No	Free text over name + description.
`page`	No
`sort`	No	Order: relevance (catalog order), provider, or name.
`tags`	No	Tag slugs. On PROVIDERS this is identity — what the company says it does, from its own apis.yml. A resource or operation term (webhook, saml, order, oai-pmh) will correctly match no provider; use find_apis?tags= for those, or find_providers?api_tags= to reach companies whose APIs merely touch it.
`limit`	No
`match`	No		any
`context`	No	Optional: why you are asking. One sentence — the task you are trying to complete, or what you expect to get back. Never included in the answer and never used to rank; it is read only when a result turns out to be wrong, which is when knowing the intent is what makes the report actionable.
`include`	No
`providers`	No
`install_method`	No	How the server is delivered: "Hosted endpoint", "GitHub repo", "Documentation link".

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

Changed1 schema field changedSep 17, 2026

changedInput schema / properties / tags / description

Previous value: -"Tag slugs. On PROVIDERS this is identity — what the company says it does, from its own apis.yml. A resource or operation term (webhook, saml, order, oai-pmh) will correctly match no provider; use find_apis?tags= for those, or api_tags below."New value: +"Tag slugs. On PROVIDERS this is identity — what the company says it does, from its own apis.yml. A resource or operation term (webhook, saml, order, oai-pmh) will correctly match no provider; use find_apis?tags= for those, or find_providers?api_tags= to reach companies whose APIs merely touch it."

Changed1 schema field changedSep 4, 2026

addedInput schema / properties / sort

Added value: +{
+  "description": "Order: relevance (catalog order), provider, or name.",
+  "enum": [
+    "relevance",
+    "provider",
+    "name"
+  ],
+  "type": "string"
+}

Changed1 schema field changedSep 2, 2026

changedInput schema / properties / tags / description

Previous value: -"Tag slugs."New value: +"Tag slugs. On PROVIDERS this is identity — what the company says it does, from its own apis.yml. A resource or operation term (webhook, saml, order, oai-pmh) will correctly match no provider; use find_apis?tags= for those, or api_tags below."

Changed1 schema field changedAug 27, 2026

addedInput schema / properties / context

Added value: +{
+  "description": "Optional: why you are asking. One sentence — the task you are trying to complete, or what you expect to get back. Never included in the answer and never used to rank; it is read only when a result turns out to be wrong, which is when knowing the intent is what makes the report actionable.",
+  "type": "string"
+}

AddedJul 16, 2026

TDQS

A4.1/5.0

Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint=true, and the description adds useful behavioral details: it mentions filtering by q/tags/providers, the include=['content'] option to inline bodies, and the context parameter's non-ranking, non-answering behavior. This adds value beyond annotations without contradiction.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, dense sentence with no fluff. It front-loads the resource and scope, then lists filtering options, and closes with an alternative. Every word earns its place.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness3/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool has 10 parameters, no output schema, and only 50% schema coverage, the description provides the core purpose and a sibling reference but omits details about pagination, match semantics, and output format. It is adequate for a simple search tool but not fully comprehensive.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 50%, and the description adds some meaning by highlighting key filters (q, tags, providers) and the include parameter's 'inlines bodies' behavior. However, it does not compensate for the undocumented parameters (page, limit, match, providers) beyond a brief mention. It partially bridges the gap but not fully.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool finds MCP servers across the catalog, with a specific resource and scope. It also distinguishes itself from a sibling tool ('Use find_artifacts for cross-type search'), making its purpose unambiguous.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

It explicitly names find_artifacts as the alternative for cross-type search, giving a clear usage boundary. However, it does not contrast with other find_* tools (e.g., find_providers, find_apis), leaving some implicit context. The overall usage is clear from the domain and name.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

All apis-io tools Inspect

Try in Browser

One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

Resources

Need Help?