Skip to main content
Glama
Sign In

apis-io

by io.apis
OverviewDiscussionsAdmin

find_collections

Read-only

Postman / Open collections across the catalog. Runnable request collections. Filter by q / tags / providers; include=["content"] inlines bodies. Use find_artifacts for cross-type search.

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
qNoFree text over name + description, e.g. "sms".
pageNoPage number, 1-based (default 1).
sortNoOrder: relevance / provider / name, or item_count (largest first).
tagsNoTag slugs, e.g. ["payments"]. On providers: what the company does (see api_tags).
limitNoResults per page, 1-100 (default 25).
matchNoHow `tags` combine: any (default) or all.any
contextNoOptional: one sentence on why you are asking. Never used to rank; read only if a result is wrong.
includeNoPass ["content"] to inline each artifact's body instead of just its URL.
providersNoProvider slugs, e.g. ["stripe"].

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed6 schema fields changed
    • changedInput schema / properties / context / description
      Previous value: -"Optional: why you are asking. One sentence — the task you are trying to complete, or what you expect to get back. Never included in the answer and never used to rank; it is read only when a result turns out to be wrong, which is when knowing the intent is what makes the report actionable."New value: +"Optional: one sentence on why you are asking. Never used to rank; read only if a result is wrong."
    • changedInput schema / properties / match / description
      Previous value: -"How multiple `tags` combine: \"any\" (default, at least one) or \"all\" (every tag)."New value: +"How `tags` combine: any (default) or all."
    • changedInput schema / properties / page / description
      Previous value: -"Page number, 1-based (default 1). Use with `limit` to walk a long list."New value: +"Page number, 1-based (default 1)."
    • changedInput schema / properties / providers / description
      Previous value: -"Provider slugs to restrict results to, e.g. [\"stripe\",\"adyen\"]."New value: +"Provider slugs, e.g. [\"stripe\"]."
    • changedInput schema / properties / q / description
      Previous value: -"Free text over name + description."New value: +"Free text over name + description, e.g. \"sms\"."
    • changedInput schema / properties / tags / description
      Previous value: -"Tag slugs. On PROVIDERS this is identity — what the company says it does, from its own apis.yml. A resource or operation term (webhook, saml, order, oai-pmh) will correctly match no provider; use find_apis?tags= for those, or find_providers?api_tags= to reach companies whose APIs merely touch it."New value: +"Tag slugs, e.g. [\"payments\"]. On providers: what the company does (see api_tags)."
  2. Changed5 schema fields changed
    • addedInput schema / properties / include / description
      Added value: +"Pass [\"content\"] to inline each artifact's body instead of just its URL."
    • addedInput schema / properties / limit / description
      Added value: +"Results per page, 1-100 (default 25)."
    • addedInput schema / properties / match / description
      Added value: +"How multiple `tags` combine: \"any\" (default, at least one) or \"all\" (every tag)."
    • addedInput schema / properties / page / description
      Added value: +"Page number, 1-based (default 1). Use with `limit` to walk a long list."
    • addedInput schema / properties / providers / description
      Added value: +"Provider slugs to restrict results to, e.g. [\"stripe\",\"adyen\"]."
  3. Changed1 schema field changed
    • changedInput schema / properties / tags / description
      Previous value: -"Tag slugs. On PROVIDERS this is identity — what the company says it does, from its own apis.yml. A resource or operation term (webhook, saml, order, oai-pmh) will correctly match no provider; use find_apis?tags= for those, or api_tags below."New value: +"Tag slugs. On PROVIDERS this is identity — what the company says it does, from its own apis.yml. A resource or operation term (webhook, saml, order, oai-pmh) will correctly match no provider; use find_apis?tags= for those, or find_providers?api_tags= to reach companies whose APIs merely touch it."
  4. Changed2 schema fields changed
    • changedInput schema / properties / sort / description
      Previous value: -"Order: name, or item_count (largest first)."New value: +"Order: relevance / provider / name, or item_count (largest first)."
    • changedInput schema / properties / sort / enum
      Previous value: -[
-  "name",
-  "item_count"
-]New value: +[
+  "relevance",
+  "provider",
+  "name",
+  "item_count"
+]
  5. Changed1 schema field changed
    • changedInput schema / properties / tags / description
      Previous value: -"Tag slugs."New value: +"Tag slugs. On PROVIDERS this is identity — what the company says it does, from its own apis.yml. A resource or operation term (webhook, saml, order, oai-pmh) will correctly match no provider; use find_apis?tags= for those, or api_tags below."
  6. Changed1 schema field changed
    • addedInput schema / properties / context
      Added value: +{
+  "description": "Optional: why you are asking. One sentence — the task you are trying to complete, or what you expect to get back. Never included in the answer and never used to rank; it is read only when a result turns out to be wrong, which is when knowing the intent is what makes the report actionable.",
+  "type": "string"
+}
  7. Added

TDQS

A3.6/5.0
Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint=true and openWorldHint=false, so the safety profile is covered. The description adds one behavioral note — include=["content"] inlines each body and the default returns 'just its URL', hinting at output shape and potential response-size cost. It adds no auth, rate-limit, or pagination behavior, so with annotations carrying the safety burden this lands at the baseline.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

It is tightly front-loaded: resource and scope first, then filters, then the alternative. Every clause carries information and nothing is padded. The telegraphic 'Postman / Open collections' opening is slightly cryptic, which keeps it from a 5.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a 9-parameter read tool with a fully-documented schema and no output schema, the description covers the essentials: what a collection is, the usable filters, the inlining option, and the cross-type alternative. Return format is only implied via 'instead of just its URL' and pagination behavior is left to the schema, which is acceptable given 100% coverage.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so the schema already documents q, tags, providers, include, sort, and pagination with examples. The description's restatement ('filter by q / tags / providers; include=["content"] inlines bodies') adds emphasis but no meaning beyond the schema. Baseline 3 is appropriate when the schema does the heavy lifting.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description names the resource and scope precisely — 'Postman / Open collections across the catalog' — and clarifies what a collection is ('runnable request collections'), which distinguishes it from type-specific siblings like find_openapis or find_mcp. It explicitly routes the agent to find_artifacts for cross-type search, so the agent can tell the two apart. The verb is only implied, keeping it short of a 5.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

It names the alternative explicitly ('Use find_artifacts for cross-type search'), giving a clear routing condition that steers the agent away from this tool when searching across types. It also enumerates the filtering dimensions (q / tags / providers) which implies when this tool fits. It stops short of stating when-not-to-use this tool beyond that single alternative.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

All apis-io toolsInspect
Try in Browser
Claude Code, inside the Godot 4 editorFlockbay puts an AI agent in the real Godot 4 editor: it writes GDScript, runs your game and fixes what breaks. Free, or bring your own Claude Code or Codex.flockbay.comAd

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

Resources