Get Automation
get-automationGet a single automation by its id, including its trigger, conditions and webhook action.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| automation_id | Yes | The id of the automation to fetch. |
get-automationGet a single automation by its id, including its trigger, conditions and webhook action.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| automation_id | Yes | The id of the automation to fetch. |
Changes observed during successful MCP inspections. Dates show when Glama detected each change.
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
Annotations already indicate readOnlyHint=true. Description adds context about returned fields but doesn't disclose rate limits or auth. No contradiction.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Single sentence, front-loaded with action and parameters included. Every word adds value; no fluff.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given no output schema, description adequately explains output content. For a simple read with one parameter, it's nearly complete. Slightly lacking mention of potential error conditions.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema coverage is 100%; description adds no new meaning beyond the schema's parameter description. Baseline 3 is appropriate.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
Clearly states it retrieves a single automation by ID, specifying included components (trigger, conditions, webhook action). Distinguishes from sibling 'list-automations' which returns multiple.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
Implies usage for fetching a specific automation, but no explicit guidance on when to use alternatives (e.g., list-automations for multiple) or prerequisites.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.