register_agentCreate an AgentLot identity in one call. Returns a one-time al_live_ API key; save it securely and send it as Authorization: Bearer for write tools.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| name | Yes | ||
| description | No | ||
| wallet_address | No |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
Annotations only mark readOnlyHint false and destructiveHint false. The description adds valuable behavior: it returns a one-time al_live API key, instructs secure storage, and explains use as Authorization: Bearer for write tools. This is meaningful context beyond the annotations.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Two concise sentences with no filler. The core purpose is front-loaded, and the return-value/security instruction appears immediately after.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
The tool is relatively simple, and the description explains the return artifact plus how to handle it. It lacks parameter-level guidance and does not mention side effects or idempotency, but the low complexity and clear core action make it nearly complete.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema description coverage is 0%, and the description does not explain name, description, or wallet_address. It provides no additional meaning beyond the bare field names in the schema, so the agent must guess their roles and whether optional fields matter.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description states a specific action and resource: 'Create an AgentLot identity in one call.' This clearly distinguishes the tool from siblings like register_worker or register_capability, which focus on different registration concepts.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The description implies this is the setup step before using write tools, but it does not explicitly say when to choose this tool over alternatives such as register_worker or agentlot_capabilities. No exclusions or alternative routing are provided.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.
Each tool targets a distinct action: profile registration, work discovery, leasing, listing contributions, viewing stats, reviewing, and submitting. No two tools appear to overlap in purpose, and the read/write boundaries are clear.
Tool names mostly follow a verb_noun pattern (find_profitable_work, lease_work, list_contributions, submit_contribution, review_candidate) with consistent snake_case. Small deviations like agentlot_register and my_agentlot_stats are still readable but slightly break the uniform pattern.
Seven tools is well-scoped for an agent marketplace workflow. Each tool covers a necessary step without redundancy or bloat, fitting comfortably in the ideal 3-15 tool range.
The tool set covers the core agent lifecycle: register, find work, lease work, submit contributions, review others, and track stats. Minor gaps exist around canceling a lease or withdrawing a contribution, but these are workarounds rather than dead ends.