Import seller services
import_my_servicesBulk import the authenticated seller's own listings.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| listings | Yes |
import_my_servicesBulk import the authenticated seller's own listings.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| listings | Yes |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
Annotations already establish that this is not read-only and not marked destructive. The description adds the useful auth and ownership context that only the authenticated seller's own listings can be imported. However, it does not disclose behaviors like duplicate handling, overwrite semantics, validation outcomes, or partial failure behavior.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is a single, front-loaded sentence with no filler. It communicates the core function immediately and wastes no words.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a bulk-import operation with no output schema, no item schema details, and no usage guidance, the description is far too thin. An agent would not know what fields a listing object must contain, what the response looks like, or what happens if some listings fail or already exist.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
The schema only defines a 'listings' array of untyped objects, and schema description coverage is 0%. The description repeats that the parameter is about 'listings' and adds 'own' and 'bulk', but it does not explain the required structure or fields for each listing object. An agent cannot construct valid input from this definition.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description states a specific verb ('Bulk import'), a concrete resource ('the authenticated seller's own listings'), and a scope ('own' vs. others), which clearly distinguishes it from sibling tools like publish_listing or search_listings. Even though the title says 'seller services' and the description says 'listings', the intent is clear.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The description gives no guidance about when to use this tool versus alternatives such as publish_listing, create_listing, or other import/export tools. The word 'Bulk' implies a use case, but there are no explicit conditions, exclusions, or alternative tool references.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.
There are multiple clusters of near-duplicate tools: earn, earn_now, earn_loop, find_money_opportunities, search_global_earn, and several rank_real_profit_opportunities variants. Even with descriptions, an agent would struggle to choose reliably among dozens of overlapping search, earn, and ranking entry points.
Most tools follow a snake_case verb_noun pattern, which provides some consistency. However, the set mixes prefixes like agentlot_, standalone verbs like earn and me, and many semantically interchangeable verbs such as find, search, discover, rank, route, and list applied to similar objects.
With 124 tools, this is an extreme mismatch for a coherent server surface. Even for a broad marketplace, this many entry points creates severe navigation overhead and includes multiple generations of similar tools instead of a disciplined, minimal API.
The tool set broadly covers marketplace lifecycles: listings, requests, orders, delivery, disputes, payouts, projects, and assets. However, there are notable gaps such as updating/unpublishing listings, canceling/refunding orders, and other core lifecycle management operations that would be expected in a complete marketplace surface.