Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided, so description carries full burden. It implies state transition from blocked to active and clarifies precondition (blocked state). However, it does not detail effects like whether job runs synchronously or what happens on failure.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two sentences, direct and front-loaded with the action and condition. No wasted words.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Description is minimal but covers core action and trigger. Output schema exists but description does not hint at response or next steps. For a simple tool with one param, it is sufficient though not exhaustive.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema has 0% description coverage; only parameter is 'job_id' with no type details beyond string. Description does not explain job_id's role or format, leaving the agent with no guidance beyond the name.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Description clearly states the verb 'Resume', the resource 'job', and the specific condition 'blocked state'. It uniquely distinguishes from siblings like 'actionlayer_cancel_job' or 'actionlayer_get_job' by focusing on resumption after blocker resolution.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Explicitly states when to use: after user has resolved the blocker. Provides clear context but does not mention when not to use or suggest alternatives, though siblings imply different scenarios.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.