Skip to main content
Glama

AstroWay Astrology API (full catalogue)

Arroyo: Relational Map

astroway_psya_relational_element_map
Read-onlyIdempotent

Relational element compatibility map.

[Group: Modern Psychological] [Endpoint: POST /v1/modern/arroyo/relational-element-map] [Required: date, time, latitude, longitude] [Cost: 10 credits (Tier 1)]

(Cursor-friendly alias for astroway_psychological_modern_arroyo_relational_element_map.)

Tool call template

Replace each placeholder with a value matching the input schema. Only required parameters are included; add optional parameters as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {
      "date": "<date>",
      "time": "<time>",
      "latitude": "<latitude>",
      "longitude": "<longitude>"
    },
    "name": "astroway_psya_relational_element_map"
  }
}

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
cityNo
dateYes
nameNo
timeYes
fieldsNoCompact mode: comma-separated dotted paths to keep, relative to `data`, e.g. "planets.name,planets.longitude,houses.cusp". Omit for the whole response.
ayanamsaNoSidereal school by name. Lahiri when omitted. Equivalent to ayanamsaId; send either.
latitudeYes
timezoneNoIANA zone name such as Europe/Kyiv, or auto to look the zone up from latitude and longitude. The server takes the offset that zone kept at this local date and time, summer time included, and uses it in place of timezoneOffset. A clock time that happened twice takes the first occurrence; one skipped when clocks went forward takes the offset from before the change. Abbreviations such as EST are refused. Before 1970 the tz database is not reliable for every place, so send timezoneOffset when the local clock is known.
cosmogramNo
longitudeYes
precisionNoCompact mode: round fractional numbers to this many decimals. Longitudes carry 14 by default; 2 is finer than any chart is drawn.
ayanamsaIdNo
zodiacTypeNo
houseSystemNoP
timezoneOffsetNoHours from UTC at the given moment, not minutes. Fractional zones are hours too: 5.5 for India, 5.75 for Nepal, -3.5 for Newfoundland. Defaults to 0, meaning UTC. Ignored when timezone is sent.

Output Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
sourceNo
doctrineNo
disclaimerNo
synergyWithNo
tensionWithNo
yourDominantNo
partnerSeekingNo

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed14 schema fields changed
    • removedInput schema / properties / ayanamsaId / anyOf
      Removed value: -[
      -  {
      -    "type": "number"
      -  },
      -  {
      -    "type": "null"
      -  }
      -]
    • addedInput schema / properties / ayanamsaId / type
      Added value: +[
      +  "number",
      +  "null"
      +]
    • removedOutput schema / properties / disclaimer / anyOf
      Removed value: -[
      -  {
      -    "type": "string"
      -  },
      -  {
      -    "type": "null"
      -  }
      -]
    • addedOutput schema / properties / disclaimer / type
      Added value: +[
      +  "string",
      +  "null"
      +]
    • removedOutput schema / properties / doctrine / anyOf
      Removed value: -[
      -  {
      -    "type": "string"
      -  },
      -  {
      -    "type": "null"
      -  }
      -]
    • addedOutput schema / properties / doctrine / type
      Added value: +[
      +  "string",
      +  "null"
      +]
    • removedOutput schema / properties / partnerSeeking / anyOf
      Removed value: -[
      -  {
      -    "type": "string"
      -  },
      -  {
      -    "type": "null"
      -  }
      -]
    • addedOutput schema / properties / partnerSeeking / type
      Added value: +[
      +  "string",
      +  "null"
      +]
    • removedOutput schema / properties / source / anyOf
      Removed value: -[
      -  {
      -    "type": "string"
      -  },
      -  {
      -    "type": "null"
      -  }
      -]
    • addedOutput schema / properties / source / type
      Added value: +[
      +  "string",
      +  "null"
      +]
    • changedOutput schema / properties / synergyWith / anyOf
      Previous value: -[
      -  {
      -    "items": {
      -      "anyOf": [
      -        {
      -          "type": "string"
      -        },
      -        {
      -          "type": "null"
      -        }
      -      ]
      -    },
      -    "type": "array"
      -  },
      -  {
      -    "type": "null"
      -  }
      -]New value: +[
      +  {
      +    "items": {
      +      "type": [
      +        "string",
      +        "null"
      +      ]
      +    },
      +    "type": "array"
      +  },
      +  {
      +    "type": "null"
      +  }
      +]
    • changedOutput schema / properties / tensionWith / anyOf
      Previous value: -[
      -  {
      -    "items": {
      -      "anyOf": [
      -        {
      -          "type": "string"
      -        },
      -        {
      -          "type": "null"
      -        }
      -      ]
      -    },
      -    "type": "array"
      -  },
      -  {
      -    "type": "null"
      -  }
      -]New value: +[
      +  {
      +    "items": {
      +      "type": [
      +        "string",
      +        "null"
      +      ]
      +    },
      +    "type": "array"
      +  },
      +  {
      +    "type": "null"
      +  }
      +]
    • removedOutput schema / properties / yourDominant / anyOf
      Removed value: -[
      -  {
      -    "type": "string"
      -  },
      -  {
      -    "type": "null"
      -  }
      -]
    • addedOutput schema / properties / yourDominant / type
      Added value: +[
      +  "string",
      +  "null"
      +]
  2. First observed

TDQS

C2.6/5.0
Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnly, idempotent, non-destructive, and closed-world, so the safety profile is covered. The description adds genuinely useful facts beyond that — the credit cost (10, Tier 1) and the endpoint/group — but says nothing about the scope or limits of the map itself.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Short, front-loaded, and the bracketed metadata is easy to scan, with the alias note last. There is little waste, though the tag block carries as much weight as the purpose sentence.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness1/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

A thin one-line purpose for a 15-parameter astrological computation tool leaves major gaps: what the relational element map contains, how ayanamsa/zodiac/house choices affect it, and whether it works for one chart or a pair. Because this is the relational variant, the absence of any mention of the second party is a significant omission.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters2/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

With 15 parameters at 33% schema description coverage, the description is expected to compensate, yet it only restates the four required fields already enforced by the schema. The optional controls (fields, precision, ayanamsa, zodiacType, houseSystem, timezone) get no explanation in the description at all.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose3/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description names the artifact ('Relational element compatibility map') but gives no verb and no detail about what is actually computed or returned. It does not distinguish this from close siblings such as element_balance or element_integration, so an agent must guess which Arroyo map it needs.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No when-to-use, when-not-to-use, or alternative-tool guidance is present. The only routing hint is the note that this is a cursor-friendly alias of astroway_psychological_modern_arroyo_relational_element_map, which addresses duplicate names but not tool selection.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

Resources