Skip to main content
Glama

AstroWay Astrology API (full catalogue)

Exercise Needs

astroway_pet_exercise_needs
Read-onlyIdempotent

Element-based daily exercise minutes + recommended activities.

[Group: Pet Astrology] [Endpoint: POST /v1/pet/exercise-needs] [Required: date, time, latitude, longitude] [Cost: 10 credits (Tier 1)]

Tool call template

Replace each placeholder with a value matching the input schema. Only required parameters are included; add optional parameters as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {
      "date": "<date>",
      "time": "<time>",
      "latitude": "<latitude>",
      "longitude": "<longitude>"
    },
    "name": "astroway_pet_exercise_needs"
  }
}

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
cityNo
dateYes
nameNo
timeYes
fieldsNoCompact mode: comma-separated dotted paths to keep, relative to `data`, e.g. "planets.name,planets.longitude,houses.cusp". Omit for the whole response.
ayanamsaNoSidereal school by name. Lahiri when omitted. Equivalent to ayanamsaId; send either.
latitudeYes
timezoneNoIANA zone name such as Europe/Kyiv, or auto to look the zone up from latitude and longitude. The server takes the offset that zone kept at this local date and time, summer time included, and uses it in place of timezoneOffset. A clock time that happened twice takes the first occurrence; one skipped when clocks went forward takes the offset from before the change. Abbreviations such as EST are refused. Before 1970 the tz database is not reliable for every place, so send timezoneOffset when the local clock is known.
cosmogramNo
longitudeYes
precisionNoCompact mode: round fractional numbers to this many decimals. Longitudes carry 14 by default; 2 is finer than any chart is drawn.
ayanamsaIdNo
zodiacTypeNo
houseSystemNoP
timezoneOffsetNoHours from UTC at the given moment, not minutes. Fractional zones are hours too: 5.5 for India, 5.75 for Nepal, -3.5 for Newfoundland. Defaults to 0, meaning UTC. Ignored when timezone is sent.

Output Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
elementNo
sunSignNo
exerciseNo
disclaimerNo

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed9 schema fields changed
    • removedInput schema / properties / ayanamsaId / anyOf
      Removed value: -[
      -  {
      -    "type": "number"
      -  },
      -  {
      -    "type": "null"
      -  }
      -]
    • addedInput schema / properties / ayanamsaId / type
      Added value: +[
      +  "number",
      +  "null"
      +]
    • removedOutput schema / properties / disclaimer / anyOf
      Removed value: -[
      -  {
      -    "type": "string"
      -  },
      -  {
      -    "type": "null"
      -  }
      -]
    • addedOutput schema / properties / disclaimer / type
      Added value: +[
      +  "string",
      +  "null"
      +]
    • removedOutput schema / properties / element / anyOf
      Removed value: -[
      -  {
      -    "type": "string"
      -  },
      -  {
      -    "type": "null"
      -  }
      -]
    • addedOutput schema / properties / element / type
      Added value: +[
      +  "string",
      +  "null"
      +]
    • changedOutput schema / properties / exercise / anyOf
      Previous value: -[
      -  {
      -    "additionalProperties": {},
      -    "properties": {
      -      "activities": {
      -        "anyOf": [
      -          {
      -            "items": {
      -              "anyOf": [
      -                {
      -                  "type": "string"
      -                },
      -                {
      -                  "type": "null"
      -                }
      -              ]
      -            },
      -            "type": "array"
      -          },
      -          {
      -            "type": "null"
      -          }
      -        ]
      -      },
      -      "intensity": {
      -        "anyOf": [
      -          {
      -            "type": "string"
      -          },
      -          {
      -            "type": "null"
      -          }
      -        ]
      -      },
      -      "minDailyMinutes": {
      -        "anyOf": [
      -          {
      -            "type": "number"
      -          },
      -          {
      -            "type": "null"
      -          }
      -        ]
      -      }
      -    },
      -    "type": "object"
      -  },
      -  {
      -    "type": "null"
      -  }
      -]New value: +[
      +  {
      +    "additionalProperties": {},
      +    "properties": {
      +      "activities": {
      +        "anyOf": [
      +          {
      +            "items": {
      +              "type": [
      +                "string",
      +                "null"
      +              ]
      +            },
      +            "type": "array"
      +          },
      +          {
      +            "type": "null"
      +          }
      +        ]
      +      },
      +      "intensity": {
      +        "type": [
      +          "string",
      +          "null"
      +        ]
      +      },
      +      "minDailyMinutes": {
      +        "type": [
      +          "number",
      +          "null"
      +        ]
      +      }
      +    },
      +    "type": "object"
      +  },
      +  {
      +    "type": "null"
      +  }
      +]
    • removedOutput schema / properties / sunSign / anyOf
      Removed value: -[
      -  {
      -    "type": "string"
      -  },
      -  {
      -    "type": "null"
      -  }
      -]
    • addedOutput schema / properties / sunSign / type
      Added value: +[
      +  "string",
      +  "null"
      +]
  2. First observed

TDQS

B3.1/5.0
Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint, idempotentHint and non-destructive behavior, so the safety profile is covered. The description adds genuinely new behavioral context the annotations lack — the POST endpoint and the 10-credit Tier 1 cost — but says nothing about what the response contains or whether the exercise minutes depend on the supplied chart settings.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two content sentences plus four bracketed metadata lines; the purpose is front-loaded and nothing is padded. The metadata block is somewhat repetitive with structured fields (required params duplicate the schema), but it stays compact.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness2/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a 15-parameter tool with an output schema, the description is thin: it never says which of the optional chart parameters actually influence exercise minutes, nor how the element is determined (sun sign? moon? chart?). An agent could call it, but not confidently choose the right parameterization.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 33%, well below the threshold where the schema carries the burden. The description only restates the four required fields (date, time, latitude, longitude), which the schema's required array already declares, and leaves the eleven optional astrological parameters (ayanamsa, houseSystem, zodiacType, fields, precision, timezone) unexplained in the context of a pet exercise calculation.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The first sentence states a concrete verb+resource pair: daily exercise minutes plus recommended activities, derived from an astrological element. That is specific enough to distinguish it from pet_diet_by_sign or pet_grooming_by_element, though it never explicitly contrasts itself with the closest sibling, astroway_pet_play_style.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description gives no when-to-use guidance and names no alternative. Apart from the '[Required: ...]' and '[Cost: ...]' metadata lines, an agent gets no signal about when this tool is the right choice versus the ~15 other pet tools or the cost_estimate tool.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

Resources