AstroWay Astrology API (full catalogue)

by info.astroway

Overview Discussions Admin

Caput Draconis

astroway_geomancy_caput_draconis

Read-onlyIdempotent

Dragon's Head: beginnings, threshold.

[Group: Geomancy (Agrippa)] [Endpoint: POST /v1/geomancy/caput-draconis] [Cost: 10 credits (Tier 1)]

Tool call template

This tool declares no required parameters. Add optional parameters from the input schema as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {},
    "name": "astroway_geomancy_caput_draconis"
  }
}

Input Schema

Name	Required	Description	Default
`fields`	No	Compact mode: comma-separated dotted paths to keep, relative to `data`, e.g. "planets.name,planets.longitude,houses.cusp". Omit for the whole response.
`precision`	No	Compact mode: round fractional numbers to this many decimals. Longitudes carry 14 by default; 2 is finer than any chart is drawn.

Output Schema

Name	Required	Description	Default
`figure`	No
`source`	No

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

Changed3 schema fields changedNov 7, 2026

changedOutput schema / properties / figure / anyOf

Previous value: -[
-  {
-    "additionalProperties": {},
-    "properties": {
-      "divinatory": {
-        "anyOf": [
-          {
-            "type": "string"
-          },
-          {
-            "type": "null"
-          }
-        ]
-      },
-      "element": {
-        "anyOf": [
-          {
-            "type": "string"
-          },
-          {
-            "type": "null"
-          }
-        ]
-      },
-      "english": {
-        "anyOf": [
-          {
-            "type": "string"
-          },
-          {
-            "type": "null"
-          }
-        ]
-      },
-      "latin": {
-        "anyOf": [
-          {
-            "type": "string"
-          },
-          {
-            "type": "null"
-          }
-        ]
-      },
-      "meaning": {
-        "anyOf": [
-          {
-            "type": "string"
-          },
-          {
-            "type": "null"
-          }
-        ]
-      },
-      "nature": {
-        "anyOf": [
-          {
-            "type": "string"
-          },
-          {
-            "type": "null"
-          }
-        ]
-      },
-      "negative": {
-        "anyOf": [
-          {
-            "type": "string"
-          },
-          {
-            "type": "null"
-          }
-        ]
-      },
-      "pattern": {
-        "anyOf": [
-          {
-            "items": {
-              "anyOf": [
-                {
-                  "type": "number"
-                },
-                {
-                  "type": "null"
-                }
-              ]
-            },
-            "type": "array"
-          },
-          {
-            "type": "null"
-          }
-        ]
-      },
-      "positive": {
-        "anyOf": [
-          {
-            "type": "string"
-          },
-          {
-            "type": "null"
-          }
-        ]
-      },
-      "ruler": {
-        "anyOf": [
-          {
-            "type": "string"
-          },
-          {
-            "type": "null"
-          }
-        ]
-      },
-      "sign": {
-        "anyOf": [
-          {
-            "type": "string"
-          },
-          {
-            "type": "null"
-          }
-        ]
-      },
-      "slug": {
-        "anyOf": [
-          {
-            "type": "string"
-          },
-          {
-            "type": "null"
-          }
-        ]
-      }
-    },
-    "type": "object"
-  },
-  {
-    "type": "null"
-  }
-]New value: +[
+  {
+    "additionalProperties": {},
+    "properties": {
+      "divinatory": {
+        "type": [
+          "string",
+          "null"
+        ]
+      },
+      "element": {
+        "type": [
+          "string",
+          "null"
+        ]
+      },
+      "english": {
+        "type": [
+          "string",
+          "null"
+        ]
+      },
+      "latin": {
+        "type": [
+          "string",
+          "null"
+        ]
+      },
+      "meaning": {
+        "type": [
+          "string",
+          "null"
+        ]
+      },
+      "nature": {
+        "type": [
+          "string",
+          "null"
+        ]
+      },
+      "negative": {
+        "type": [
+          "string",
+          "null"
+        ]
+      },
+      "pattern": {
+        "anyOf": [
+          {
+            "items": {
+              "type": [
+                "number",
+                "null"
+              ]
+            },
+            "type": "array"
+          },
+          {
+            "type": "null"
+          }
+        ]
+      },
+      "positive": {
+        "type": [
+          "string",
+          "null"
+        ]
+      },
+      "ruler": {
+        "type": [
+          "string",
+          "null"
+        ]
+      },
+      "sign": {
+        "type": [
+          "string",
+          "null"
+        ]
+      },
+      "slug": {
+        "type": [
+          "string",
+          "null"
+        ]
+      }
+    },
+    "type": "object"
+  },
+  {
+    "type": "null"
+  }
+]

removedOutput schema / properties / source / anyOf

Removed value: -[
-  {
-    "type": "string"
-  },
-  {
-    "type": "null"
-  }
-]

addedOutput schema / properties / source / type
```
Added value: +[
+  "string",
+  "null"
+]
```

First observedOct 5, 2026

TDQS

C2.9/5.0

Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnly, idempotent, non-destructive, closed-world behavior, so the safety profile is covered. The description adds genuinely new operational context — the POST endpoint and a 10-credit Tier 1 cost — which helps an agent budget calls, but says nothing about response shape or latency.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The prose is a single terse phrase with zero waste, and the bracketed metadata lines are front-loaded and easy to scan. Slightly cryptic, but nothing is redundant.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness3/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

An output schema, complete annotations, and fully documented parameters carry most of the burden for this simple 2-optional-param call. Still, the description omits what the call actually returns conceptually (a figure interpretation?) and any usage orientation, leaving a modest gap.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100% and both parameters (fields, precision) are fully documented in the schema with examples. The description adds nothing about parameters, so the baseline of 3 applies.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose3/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description names the geomantic figure ('Dragon's Head') and gives its symbolic keyword ('beginnings, threshold'), but never states the action the tool performs — whether it returns a reading, a chart placement, or an interpretation. An agent can infer it is a single-figure geomancy lookup, yet the verb is missing.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

There is no guidance on when to choose this figure over the 16 sibling geomancy tools (Albus, Puella, Via, etc.) or when a broader geomancy endpoint would be preferred. The agent is left to infer selection purely from the figure's name.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

All AstroWay Astrology API (full catalogue) tools Inspect

Try in Browser

One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

Resources

Need Help?