Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description must carry the full burden. It mentions Hungarian and English search support, but does not disclose behavioral traits like authentication needs, rate limits, data freshness, or return format. The description adds minimal behavioral context beyond what is obvious from the name and schema.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is two short sentences, front-loading the tool's purpose and key search dimensions. Every word is useful; no redundancy. Highly efficient.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given 10 parameters and no output schema, the description is clear on search dimensions but omits expected return format (e.g., product list with fields). It does not address pagination beyond the limit parameter. It references category and manufacturer IDs from sibling tools in schema, but not in description. Adequate but incomplete for a fully informed agent.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so baseline is 3. The description adds a multilingual capability note not present in schema, but otherwise does not significantly enhance parameter meaning beyond what schema already provides.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states it's a product search tool for the XFish.hu fishing webshop and lists the search criteria (text, category, manufacturer, brand, price, stock). It distinguishes from sibling tools (get_categories, get_manufacturers, get_product_details) by its search focus.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies usage for searching products but does not explicitly state when to use this tool vs alternatives. It mentions category and manufacturer IDs referring to other tools in schema descriptions, but no explicit 'when-not-to-use' or alternatives in the main description.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.