Skip to main content
Glama

EaseWeb

Get one slide

get_slide
Read-only

One slide of a presentation you can see, with all of its blocks (ids and complete props).

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
slugYesThe presentation's slug (its address: /movie/<slug>/).
slide_idYesThe id of a slide (stable, the "id" of the slide in the presentation). Its number (position) changes when slides are reordered.

Output Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
hNo
wNo
bgNo
idYesStable id of the slide.
fitNo
urlNoThe address people open in a browser.
nameNo
numberYes1-based position; changes when slides are reordered.
objectsYesBlocks, bottom to top.
backgroundNoThe "src" of the background picture, or null.

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed1 schema field changed
    • changedOutput schema / (root)
      Previous value: -nullNew value: +{
      +  "properties": {
      +    "background": {
      +      "description": "The \"src\" of the background picture, or null.",
      +      "type": [
      +        "string",
      +        "null"
      +      ]
      +    },
      +    "bg": {
      +      "type": "string"
      +    },
      +    "fit": {
      +      "type": "string"
      +    },
      +    "h": {
      +      "type": "integer"
      +    },
      +    "id": {
      +      "description": "Stable id of the slide.",
      +      "type": "integer"
      +    },
      +    "name": {
      +      "type": "string"
      +    },
      +    "number": {
      +      "description": "1-based position; changes when slides are reordered.",
      +      "type": "integer"
      +    },
      +    "objects": {
      +      "description": "Blocks, bottom to top.",
      +      "items": {
      +        "properties": {
      +          "id": {
      +            "type": "integer"
      +          },
      +          "props": {
      +            "description": "Every prop of the block (see the block format reference).",
      +            "type": "object"
      +          },
      +          "type": {
      +            "description": "text, shape, button, line, image or code.",
      +            "type": "string"
      +          }
      +        },
      +        "required": [
      +          "id",
      +          "type",
      +          "props"
      +        ],
      +        "type": "object"
      +      },
      +      "type": "array"
      +    },
      +    "url": {
      +      "description": "The address people open in a browser.",
      +      "type": "string"
      +    },
      +    "w": {
      +      "type": "integer"
      +    }
      +  },
      +  "required": [
      +    "id",
      +    "number",
      +    "objects"
      +  ],
      +  "type": "object"
      +}
  2. First observed

TDQS

B3.2/5.0
Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint=true, openWorldHint=false and destructiveHint=false, so the safety profile is covered. The description adds that the payload includes blocks with ids and complete props, which is useful content-level context, but omits anything about access requirements or payload size.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

A single tight sentence with the resource front-loaded and the payload contents appended. It is a fragment rather than a full sentence, but nothing is wasted.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With an output schema present and full parameter documentation, the description only needs to frame the tool, which it does. The one missing piece is routing guidance relative to the many sibling read tools.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% and both required parameters (slug, slide_id) are fully documented in the schema, including the subtlety that slide_id is stable while position is not. The description adds nothing beyond that, so the baseline 3 applies.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific resource (one slide) and its scope (all blocks, with ids and complete props), which distinguishes it from get_presentation. It is not fully explicit about the verb, but 'One slide of a presentation' is unambiguous enough that an agent knows what it retrieves.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The only contextual cue is 'a presentation you can see,' hinting at an access prerequisite. There is no statement of when to use this versus get_presentation, read_presentation, or get_slide-adjacent siblings like edit_blocks/update_slide.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

Resources