Skip to main content
Glama

start_2fa_for_action

Start a 2FA challenge that grants the authenticated user permission to perform a sensitive action. The 2FA must complete on a channel DIFFERENT from the user's last login channel (the backend enforces this). On success a grant is stored keyed by the user id and action_type; middleware on the protected endpoint reads the grant and allows the mutation.

Destructive action types (api_key_create, api_key_revoke, api_key_regenerate, api_key_view, account_delete, phone_remove, email_remove, phone_primary, email_primary, revocation_bulk, domain_remove, profile_delete) are capped at 5min TTL and forced single-use by server policy. A step-up for revocation_bulk, phone_remove, email_remove, domain_remove, profile_delete or account_delete is bound to targets — the exact ids the protected call will carry. Configuration scopes (settings_write, profile_update, templates_write) allow up to 24h TTL and caller-chosen single_use — useful for agents making multiple settings mutations in one session.

Agent usage: (1) Attempt the sensitive call; if you get 403 2fa_required note the action_type. (2) Call start_2fa_for_action with that action_type and a channel different from the login channel. (3) Present the challenge: on telegram/whatsapp pass deep_link to render_auth_link; on sms show sms_message and the number to send it to; on email check the response first: with more than one verified email and no email_id given, it answers 200 with requires_email_selection: true and available_emails — NO session was started and nothing was sent, so ask the user which address and call again with email_id rather than telling them to open a mailbox. Never hand qr_text to a link renderer — it is the link already rendered as QR art. Print it verbatim inside a fenced code block only when a real terminal needs the QR. (4) Call wait_for_2fa until the session is verified. (5) Retry the original sensitive call.

The user does not see tool results — most clients fold them away, render_auth_link's output included. Before you wait or poll, put what the user must act on into your own reply text: the link itself (not a sentence announcing it), the SMS text and number, or a note to check their inbox.

ACCESS: needs a Proof account. Authenticate this client (Claude Code: /mcp → Authenticate), then call this tool again. start_login does NOT open this tool.

Tool call template

Replace each placeholder with a value matching the input schema. Only required parameters are included; add optional parameters as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {
      "action_type": "<action_type>",
      "channel": "<channel>"
    },
    "name": "start_2fa_for_action"
  }
}

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
channelYesChannel for the 2FA challenge — must differ from the user's last login channel
targetsNoThe ids the step-up is FOR — the grant is bound to exactly these and refused for any other request (`reason: target_mismatch`). revocation_bulk: the asset id you will pass to revoke_asset (one code per asset); phone_remove / email_remove: the phone or email record id; domain_remove: the domain id; profile_delete: the sub-account id; account_delete: your own user id (get_current_user). Leave out for the other action types.
email_idNoOptional: specific UserEmail id for email-channel 2FA
phone_idNoOptional: specific UserPhone id for phone-channel 2FA
single_useNoWhether the grant is consumed on first use. Server forces true for destructive action types. Defaults to true.
action_typeYesThe sensitive action the 2FA grant will authorize: any action type the API documents. The server caps each by its policy: destructive types (e.g. api_key_*, *_remove, revocation_bulk, account_delete) to 5 min TTL and single use; configuration scopes (e.g. settings_write, webhook_write) up to 24h with caller-chosen single_use.
ttl_secondsNoRequested grant lifetime in seconds. Server caps to 300s for destructive action types, 86400s for configuration scopes. Defaults to 300 if omitted.

Output Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
emailNoThe address the code went to, masked (`email` only)
statusNo
channelNo
messageNo
qr_codeNoBase64-encoded PNG QR code for `deep_link`
qr_textNoUTF-8 text QR for `deep_link`, for terminal/agent rendering
sms_codeNoThe short code the person texts (`sms` only)
sms_didsNoOur SMS numbers, one entry per region and always all three. A region with no number configured carries an empty `did` and no QR code.
deep_linkNoOpens Telegram or WhatsApp with what the person sends (`telegram`, `whatsapp`)
email_sentNo`true` when the code was emailed (`email` only)
expires_atNo
session_idNo
sms_messageNoThe message to send (`sms` only)
instructionsNoOne line telling the person what to do
available_emailsNoThe addresses the code may go to; call again with one of their ids as `email_id`
requires_email_selectionNoAlways `true`: no session was started, pick an address and start again
second_method_recommendedNoPresent (true) when the step-up uses the channel the account signed in with, because the account has no other; adding a second channel is recommended

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed4 schema fields changed
    • changedInput schema / properties / action_type / description
      Previous value: -"The sensitive action the 2FA grant will authorize. Destructive scopes (api_key_*, account_delete, phone_remove, email_remove, phone_primary, email_primary, revocation_bulk, domain_remove, profile_delete) are capped at 5 min TTL + forced single-use. Configuration scopes (settings_write, profile_update, templates_write) allow up to 24h TTL with caller-chosen single_use. See config/twoFAPolicy.ts on the backend for the canonical policy."New value: +"The sensitive action the 2FA grant will authorize: any action type the API documents. The server caps each by its policy: destructive types (e.g. api_key_*, *_remove, revocation_bulk, account_delete) to 5 min TTL and single use; configuration scopes (e.g. settings_write, webhook_write) up to 24h with caller-chosen single_use."
    • changedInput schema / properties / action_type / enum
      Previous value: -[
      -  "api_key_create",
      -  "api_key_revoke",
      -  "api_key_regenerate",
      -  "api_key_view",
      -  "phone_remove",
      -  "email_remove",
      -  "account_delete",
      -  "revocation_bulk",
      -  "domain_remove",
      -  "profile_delete",
      -  "phone_primary",
      -  "email_primary",
      -  "settings_write",
      -  "profile_update",
      -  "templates_write"
      -]New value: +[
      +  "api_key_view",
      +  "api_key_create",
      +  "api_key_revoke",
      +  "api_key_regenerate",
      +  "phone_add",
      +  "phone_remove",
      +  "phone_primary",
      +  "email_add",
      +  "email_remove",
      +  "email_primary",
      +  "account_delete",
      +  "master_key_change",
      +  "hitl_key_rotate",
      +  "revocation_bulk",
      +  "settings_write",
      +  "profile_update",
      +  "templates_write",
      +  "webhook_write",
      +  "delegation_lifecycle",
      +  "company_update",
      +  "domain_remove",
      +  "profile_delete",
      +  "account_delete_cancel",
      +  "plan_change",
      +  "auto_top_up_change"
      +]
    • changedInput schema / properties / targets / description
      Previous value: -"The ids the step-up is FOR — the grant is bound to exactly these and refused for any other request (`reason: target_mismatch`). revocation_bulk: the asset id you will pass to revoke_asset (one code per asset); phone_remove / email_remove: the phone or email record id; domain_remove: the domain id; profile_delete: the project id; account_delete: your own user id (get_current_user). Leave out for the other action types."New value: +"The ids the step-up is FOR — the grant is bound to exactly these and refused for any other request (`reason: target_mismatch`). revocation_bulk: the asset id you will pass to revoke_asset (one code per asset); phone_remove / email_remove: the phone or email record id; domain_remove: the domain id; profile_delete: the sub-account id; account_delete: your own user id (get_current_user). Leave out for the other action types."
    • changedOutput schema / (root)
      Previous value: -nullNew value: +{
      +  "$schema": "http://json-schema.org/draft-07/schema#",
      +  "additionalProperties": {},
      +  "properties": {
      +    "available_emails": {
      +      "description": "The addresses the code may go to; call again with one of their ids as `email_id`"
      +    },
      +    "channel": {},
      +    "deep_link": {
      +      "description": "Opens Telegram or WhatsApp with what the person sends (`telegram`, `whatsapp`)"
      +    },
      +    "email": {
      +      "description": "The address the code went to, masked (`email` only)"
      +    },
      +    "email_sent": {
      +      "description": "`true` when the code was emailed (`email` only)"
      +    },
      +    "expires_at": {},
      +    "instructions": {
      +      "description": "One line telling the person what to do"
      +    },
      +    "message": {},
      +    "qr_code": {
      +      "description": "Base64-encoded PNG QR code for `deep_link`"
      +    },
      +    "qr_text": {
      +      "description": "UTF-8 text QR for `deep_link`, for terminal/agent rendering"
      +    },
      +    "requires_email_selection": {
      +      "description": "Always `true`: no session was started, pick an address and start again"
      +    },
      +    "second_method_recommended": {
      +      "description": "Present (true) when the step-up uses the channel the account signed in with, because the account has no other; adding a second channel is recommended"
      +    },
      +    "session_id": {},
      +    "sms_code": {
      +      "description": "The short code the person texts (`sms` only)"
      +    },
      +    "sms_dids": {
      +      "description": "Our SMS numbers, one entry per region and always all three. A region with no number configured carries an empty `did` and no QR code."
      +    },
      +    "sms_message": {
      +      "description": "The message to send (`sms` only)"
      +    },
      +    "status": {}
      +  },
      +  "type": "object"
      +}
  2. Changed1 schema field changed
    • removedInput schema / additionalProperties
      Removed value: -false
  3. Changed3 schema fields changed
    • changedInput schema / properties / action_type / description
      Previous value: -"The sensitive action the 2FA grant will authorize. Destructive scopes (api_key_*, account_delete, phone_remove, email_remove, revocation_bulk) are capped at 5 min TTL + forced single-use. Configuration scopes (settings_write, profile_update, templates_write) allow up to 24h TTL with caller-chosen single_use. See config/twoFAPolicy.ts on the backend for the canonical policy."New value: +"The sensitive action the 2FA grant will authorize. Destructive scopes (api_key_*, account_delete, phone_remove, email_remove, phone_primary, email_primary, revocation_bulk, domain_remove, profile_delete) are capped at 5 min TTL + forced single-use. Configuration scopes (settings_write, profile_update, templates_write) allow up to 24h TTL with caller-chosen single_use. See config/twoFAPolicy.ts on the backend for the canonical policy."
    • changedInput schema / properties / action_type / enum
      Previous value: -[
      -  "api_key_create",
      -  "api_key_revoke",
      -  "api_key_regenerate",
      -  "api_key_view",
      -  "phone_remove",
      -  "email_remove",
      -  "account_delete",
      -  "revocation_bulk",
      -  "settings_write",
      -  "profile_update",
      -  "templates_write"
      -]New value: +[
      +  "api_key_create",
      +  "api_key_revoke",
      +  "api_key_regenerate",
      +  "api_key_view",
      +  "phone_remove",
      +  "email_remove",
      +  "account_delete",
      +  "revocation_bulk",
      +  "domain_remove",
      +  "profile_delete",
      +  "phone_primary",
      +  "email_primary",
      +  "settings_write",
      +  "profile_update",
      +  "templates_write"
      +]
    • addedInput schema / properties / targets
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "The ids the step-up is FOR — the grant is bound to exactly these and refused for any other request (`reason: target_mismatch`). revocation_bulk: the asset id you will pass to revoke_asset (one code per asset); phone_remove / email_remove: the phone or email record id; domain_remove: the domain id; profile_delete: the project id; account_delete: your own user id (get_current_user). Leave out for the other action types.",
      +  "items": {
      +    "maxLength": 256,
      +    "minLength": 1,
      +    "type": "string"
      +  },
      +  "maxItems": 25,
      +  "minItems": 1,
      +  "type": "array"
      +}
  4. First observed

TDQS

A4.8/5.0
Behavior5/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations only declare readOnlyHint=false/destructiveHint=false, so the description carries the real burden and does: grant storage keyed by user id + action_type, server-enforced 5min/single-use caps for destructive types, 24h TTL for configuration scopes, targets binding with target_mismatch refusal, and the requires_email_selection no-op edge case. It also warns the user cannot see tool results, which changes how an agent must behave.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Long, but the tool genuinely is complex and the text is front-loaded: purpose, then policy, then a numbered agent procedure. Some redundancy exists because the TTL and single-use caps are restated in the schema and in the action_type/ttl_seconds descriptions.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the presence of an output schema, annotations, and seven parameters, the description covers what an agent still needs: auth prerequisite, channel-must-differ rule, per-channel presentation guidance, the email-selection dead end, and the full step-up lifecycle. Nothing material is missing.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% and per-parameter descriptions are already detailed, which sets a baseline of 3. The description still adds cross-parameter policy context (which action types force single_use/TTL caps, that targets must be the exact ids the protected call will carry) and ties parameters to the workflow steps, so it is modestly above baseline without fully unique content.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Opens with a specific verb+resource: 'Start a 2FA challenge that grants the authenticated user permission to perform a sensitive action.' It immediately scopes the tool to step-up authorization for mutations, which separates it from generic auth siblings like start_2fa/start_login and from the follow-up sibling wait_for_2fa.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Provides an explicit numbered workflow (trigger the 403 2fa_required, note action_type, call this tool, present the challenge via render_auth_link or raw text, wait_for_2fa, retry) and names the alternatives and their conditions. It also states a negative constraint: 'start_login does NOT open this tool.'

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.