guide-registry

List the guide registry

list_guides

Read-only

List the bicycle.guide registry — every guide's home, status, access, standard, syndication and grounding, plus the distribution roll-up (including guides homed to a property with no rendering surface).

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema

Name	Required	Description
`home`	No	Filter by owning property, e.g. jobframe, peopleanalyst, penwright.
`limit`	No	Cap the rows returned. Default 100, max 500.
`access`	No	Filter by access: free \| gated.
`domain`	No	Filter by life-domain — the layer ABOVE the subject shelf: work \| life \| play. Derived from the guide's category via content/registry/shelves.json. `rollup.by_domain` lists them.
`fields`	No	Row shape. "compact" returns only slug/title/home/status/access/price_cents/has_artifact/category/domain/personas/canonical_url — no rollup, no registry_meta. "full" returns the entire decorated registry row plus the rollup and registry_meta, as before. Default over this server: "compact".
`series`	No	Filter by guide series — the operational grouping of guides made to be used together, e.g. competencies, penwright-writing, startup-journey, ladder:hr-business-partner.
`status`	No	Filter by status: on \| draft.
`persona`	No	Filter by the audience a guide serves, e.g. people-analytics-professional, aspiring-author, executive-performance-leader. A guide can serve several; this matches any of them.
`category`	No	Filter by subject shelf — the reader-facing topic axis, e.g. field, skills, analytics, writing, comp. Matches the primary category OR a cross-shelf tag.
`standard`	No	Filter by standard: bicycle \| life-stage \| problem-opportunity.
`guide_type`	No	Filter by guide CLASS: career (level-based job guides, their own program) \| capability \| book_profile. Combine with series=ladder:<role> to get one role's whole ladder.
`has_artifact`	No	Only guides that do (true) / do not (false) have a new-design artifact.
`home_unrouted`	No	Only guides whose home has NO rendering surface at all (the distribution gap).

Output Schema

TableJSON Schema

Name	Required	Description	Default
`count`	Yes
`limit`	Yes
`fields`	Yes
`guides`	Yes
`rollup`	No
`filters`	Yes
`api_version`	Yes
`registry_meta`	No
`total_matching`	Yes

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections. Dates show when Glama detected each change.

First observedSep 8, 2026

TDQS

A4/5.0

Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already establish that this is a read-only, non-destructive operation, so the description only needs to add context. It adds useful behavioral detail: the distribution roll-up and the inclusion of guides homed to properties with no rendering surface. However, 'every guide' is slightly overstated given the schema's default 100-row limit, which prevents a top score.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single dense sentence with the verb and resource front-loaded. The list of fields and the roll-up parenthetical are additive and meaningful; there is no filler, repetition of schema text, or extraneous information.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a broad listing tool, the description plus 100% documented parameters, read-only annotations, and an output schema covers most of what an agent needs for correct invocation. It lacks an explicit pagination caveat and alternative-tool routing, but those gaps are not severe enough to make the description incomplete for basic use.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, and the schema entries are already detailed with examples, value hints, and filtering semantics. The description does not add any parameter-level meaning beyond what the schema provides, so it earns the baseline 3 rather than higher.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description opens with a precise verb and resource: 'List the bicycle.guide registry,' and then details what the registry contains, including the distribution roll-up. This distinguishes it from sibling tools like get_guide (single guide) and list_capabilities/list_taxonomy (other registries). The parenthetical about guides with no rendering surface adds non-obvious scope.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines3/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

There is no explicit 'use this when...' or 'instead of...' guidance, and no sibling tool is named as an alternative. The registry-listing intent is implied by the verb and rich filter set, but the description leaves when-to-use-versus-get_guide or the other list tools to inference.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

All guide-registry tools Inspect

Try in Browser

RayrunBuild, deploy, and operate MCP servers without becoming an infrastructure team.ray.runAd

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

Resources

Need Help?