Skip to main content
Glama

Diavgis — Greek Public Procurement

Plan, Usage and Remaining Calls

get_quota
Read-onlyIdempotent

What this API key is allowed to do right now: plan, calls used this period, calls remaining, per-minute rate, page-size and pagination caps, and when the period resets. Free — this call is not counted against the quota. Check it before starting a long job so you can size the work instead of hitting a wall mid-task.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault

No arguments

Output Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
planYes
usedYescalls consumed this period (REST + MCP share one counter)
limitNomonthly quota, null if unlimited
max_pagesYespagination depth cap; deeper pages return an error, narrow with filters instead
remainingNo
pricing_urlNo
period_resetYesISO date when used resets to 0
rate_per_minYes
max_page_sizeYes

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed1 schema field changed
    • changedOutput schema / properties / plan / enum
      Previous value: -[
      -  "free",
      -  "pro",
      -  "business"
      -]New value: +[
      +  "free",
      +  "basic",
      +  "pro",
      +  "business"
      +]
  2. Added

TDQS

A4.7/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnly, idempotent, non-destructive, openWorld, so the safety profile is covered. The description adds a genuinely non-obvious behavioral fact not in the annotations: the call is free and excluded from quota accounting. It stops short of describing freshness/latency or error behavior, so it is strong but not exhaustive.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Three tight sentences, front-loaded with what is returned, then cost, then the recommended call timing. Every sentence carries distinct information with no repetition of the title or schema.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

A no-parameter, read-only introspection tool with an output schema already describing the returned fields; the description need not restate returns. What an agent needs — what it gets, that it is free, and when to call it — is fully covered.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The tool takes zero parameters, so the schema-description baseline of 4 applies; there is nothing parameter-level for the description to clarify or compensate for.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a precise verb+resource (get the API key's quota) and enumerates the exact payload: plan, calls used/remaining, per-minute rate, page-size and pagination caps, and reset timing. No sibling tool (entity/contract/tender lookups) touches quota, so the boundary is unambiguous.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Gives explicit, actionable timing: 'Check it before starting a long job so you can size the work instead of hitting a wall mid-task.' It also removes the usual hesitation about calling a meta-tool by noting the call is free and not counted against quota.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.