get_order_status
Check the status of an order previously created with create_order.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| domain | Yes | ||
| orderId | Yes |
Check the status of an order previously created with create_order.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| domain | Yes | ||
| orderId | Yes |
Changes observed during successful MCP inspections. Dates show when Glama detected each change.
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations provided; description only says 'check', missing details on side effects, error handling, or read-only nature. Minimal transparency.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Single concise sentence with no unnecessary words or repetition.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given no output schema and 2 parameters, the description lacks return value details and error behavior, making it incomplete.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema has 0% description coverage; description does not explain domain or orderId parameters at all.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
Description clearly states the tool checks order status and references the associated create_order tool, distinguishing it from sibling reservation tools. However, it doesn't explicitly differentiate from get_reservation_status.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
Implies usage after create_order but no explicit when-not or alternative guidance. Siblings listed but no comparison.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.