Skip to main content
Glama

PublicAdjusters.fyi

Get Course

get_course
Read-onlyIdempotent

Get one published academy course by its slug, with its objectives, lessons and FAQ. Exam questions and answers are never returned.

Tool call template

Replace each placeholder with a value matching the input schema. Only required parameters are included; add optional parameters as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {
      "slug": "<slug>"
    },
    "name": "get_course"
  }
}

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
slugYesThe course slug.

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Added

TDQS

A3.8/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare read-only, idempotent, closed-world and non-destructive behavior, so the bar is lower. The description still adds real context: only published courses resolve, and objectives, lessons and FAQ come back while exam questions and answers never do — important for an agent assembling study material.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

One front-loaded sentence with no filler; the scope, payload and exclusion are all packed efficiently.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With no output schema, the description names what is returned (objectives, lessons, FAQ) and what is deliberately withheld (exam Q&A), which is enough for a single-parameter read tool. A note on behavior for unpublished or missing slugs would close the remaining gap.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100% and the single slug parameter already carries pattern, length and description constraints. The description restates the slug lookup but adds no new format or normalization guidance, so the baseline 3 applies.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific verb (get) and resource (one published academy course) plus the lookup key (slug) and the returned sections. It is clearly narrower than list_courses, though it does not name the sibling explicitly.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines3/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Usage is implied: fetch a single course when you already know its slug, and only published courses are eligible. There are no explicit alternatives or when-not-to-use guidance beyond the note that exam content is excluded.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

Resources