TrendIdea

generate_business_model

Idempotent

Generate a Business Model Canvas (Osterwalder) for an idea with strategic depth: key partners, activities, resources, value propositions, customer relationships, channels, segments, cost structure, revenue streams and a synthesis. Returns cached canvas instantly if one exists, otherwise generates fresh analysis. Spends 1 credit only when generating new content. Not read-only; pass an ideaId you own.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema

Name	Required	Description	Default
`ideaId`	Yes	The idea ID
`language`	No	Response language	en

Output Schema

TableJSON Schema

Name	Required	Description	Default
`result`	Yes	The tool result rendered as human and AI readable text or markdown.

TDQS

A4.7/5.0

Behavior5/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description discloses valuable dynamic behavior beyond annotations: returns cached canvas instantly if available, generates fresh analysis otherwise, charges one credit only for new content, and calls out non-read-only status. This gives the agent accurate expectations about side effects, costs, and performance.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Three front-loaded sentences cover purpose, behavior, cost, and prerequisite without padding. Every clause adds operational value for the agent.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Description is complete for a generation tool with an existing output schema and well-documented parameters. It tells the agent what to generate, how caching varies, how billing works, and what preconditions are required, leaving no major operational gap.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, so the baseline is 3. The description adds meaningful ownership information with 'pass an ideaId you own' and links credit consumption to new generation, which helps the agent understand the ideaId as a user-scoped, side-effect-bearing input.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description opens with a specific verb and resource: 'Generate a Business Model Canvas (Osterwalder) for an idea,' then enumerates the exact canvas components and synthesis. This clearly distinguishes the tool from siblings like generate_b2b_pitch and generate_strategic_review.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

It sets clear usage context by stating it operates on an idea and must be passed an owned ideaId. It also warns that it is not read-only, but it does not explicitly name alternative tools for other strategic outputs or describe when to choose this tool over siblings.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

All TrendIdea tools Inspect

Try in Browser

RayrunBuild, deploy, and operate MCP servers without becoming an infrastructure team.ray.runAd

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

TDQS

A4.1/5.0

Disambiguation5/5

Each tool targets a distinct function or data aspect, from idea CRUD to simulations, content generation, and team management. Despite the large number, descriptions clearly differentiate purposes, e.g., 'get_idea_summary' vs. 'get_idea_agents' vs. 'get_idea_evolution'. No two tools appear to do the same thing.

Naming Consistency5/5

All tools follow a consistent verb_noun pattern in snake_case (e.g., 'create_idea', 'get_competitive_density', 'toggle_favorite'). No mixing of conventions like camelCase or abbreviations. The pattern is uniform and predictable.

Tool Count2/5

63 tools is far beyond the typical well-scoped range of 3-15. While the platform's broad scope (idea validation, B2B, team, simulations) justifies many, the sheer volume can overwhelm an agent. A more curated subset or grouping would improve coherence.

Completeness5/5

The tool set covers the full startup idea lifecycle: creation, validation, retrieval of various analyses, updates, deletion, sharing, simulations, B2B lead generation, team collaboration, and market intelligence. No obvious gaps exist for the stated domain.

Resources

Need Help?