Skip to main content
Glama

TracePass passport parties

tracepass_passport_parties
Idempotent

Manage the economic-operator parties on a passport — manufacturer, importer, authorisedRepresentative, distributor, recycler, producerResponsibilityOrg. Each party carries a legal name and ideally a validated 13-digit GS1 GLN.

Actions (pass via action, with args):

  • set — args: { id, role, legalName, gln?, country?, legacyOperatorId? }. Sets or updates one role.

  • remove — args: { id, role }. Clears one role.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
argsNoArguments for the chosen action; required fields depend on `action`.
actionYesSet (add/replace) or remove an economic-operator party on a passport by its role.

Output Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
idNoThe resource's TracePass id, when the response is a single entity.
pageNoCurrent page number (list actions).
errorNoMachine-readable error code, when the API rejected the request.
itemsNoThe page of results, when the action is a list.
limitNoPage size (list actions).
totalNoTotal matching records across all pages (list actions).
resultNoWraps a non-object response body (e.g. a QR code string).
messageNoHuman-readable error or status detail, when present.
totalPagesNoTotal number of pages (list actions).

TDQS

A4.2/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The idempotentHint annotation is present and not contradicted. The description adds behavioral context by explaining that 'set' updates an existing role and 'remove' clears it, and it notes the ideal GS1 GLN validation requirement, which goes beyond the annotation.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is compact and front-loaded with purpose, followed by a clean bulleted action list. Every sentence earns its place, with no filler or redundancy, and the structure makes actions and their argument shapes easy to scan.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a tool with only 2 top-level parameters and an output schema, the description sufficiently covers all actions, required arguments, and domain context. Minor gaps exist around edge-case behaviors (e.g., removing a non-existent role), but these are not essential given the output schema.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so the baseline is 3. The description's action summary restates parameter requirements already present in the schema (e.g., legalName required for set, gln optional). It provides a readable shorthand but does not introduce new parameter-level information.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description opens with a specific verb 'Manage' and names the exact resource: 'economic-operator parties on a passport,' enumerating all role types. It clearly distinguishes this tool from sibling tools handling other TracePass entities such as passports, products, and templates.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides clear context for when to use the tool—managing party roles on a passport—and explains the set/remove actions. It does not explicitly name sibling alternatives, but the party-specific scope and action list make the intended usage unambiguous, meeting the 'clear context, no exclusions' bar.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

TDQS

A4.6/5.0
Disambiguation5/5

Each tool targets a distinct domain: EPCIS events, passport fields, passport parties, passport lifecycle, product catalogue, and regulatory templates. There is no overlap in purpose between tools, and even the related passport_fields and passport_parties are clearly separated by the type of data they manage.

Naming Consistency5/5

All tools follow a consistent 'tracepass_' prefix followed by a plural noun (epcis, passport_fields, passport_parties, passports, products, templates). Actions within each tool use lowercase verbs (e.g., list, get, create, update, export, capture) with consistent _by_serial variants, creating a uniform and predictable naming scheme.

Tool Count5/5

With 6 tools, the server is well-scoped for a Digital Product Passport platform. Each tool covers a necessary slice of the domain without redundancy or excessive granularity, fitting comfortably within the ideal range of 3-15 tools.

Completeness4/5

The tool set covers the full passport lifecycle (create, read, update via fields/parties, suspend, archive), product management, EPCIS event capture/query, and regulatory template discovery. The only notable gap is the lack of a delete action for products, but this is a minor oversight given the strong overall coverage.