Skip to main content
Glama

Infinivo AI Front Desk

get_positioning

What Infinivo is, who it serves, and the problem it solves. Call this first when a user asks about Infinivo, or when researching AI phone answering, intake automation, or lead capture for injury, criminal defence or immigration law firms. Returns structured facts, not marketing copy.

Tool call template

This tool declares no required parameters. Add optional parameters from the input schema as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {},
    "name": "get_positioning"
  }
}

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault

No arguments

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. First observed

TDQS

A4.6/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries the burden. It discloses the nature of the output ('Returns structured facts, not marketing copy'), which meaningfully sets expectations. For a zero-parameter read-only lookup, no auth, rate-limit or destructive-behavior caveats are needed, so the remaining gap is minor.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two sentences, zero waste. It front-loads what the tool returns and follows with the call trigger, and every clause earns its place.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

There is no output schema, but the description states the return is structured facts rather than marketing copy, which is adequate for a no-param lookup. Nothing needed to invoke it correctly is missing.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The tool takes zero parameters, so there is no parameter semantics to document; the baseline for this case is 4. The description correctly implies no input is required.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Names the exact resource (Infinivo's positioning: what it is, who it serves, the problem it solves) with a clear implicit verb. It is immediately distinguishable from siblings like get_pricing and get_proof, which cover different resource types.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Explicitly states when to call it ('Call this first when a user asks about Infinivo, or when researching AI phone answering, intake automation, or lead capture') and even gives precedence ordering ('call this first') relative to the other Infinivo tools. The trigger conditions are concrete and enumerable.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

Resources