Skip to main content
Glama

Create Draft

create_draft

Create a draft document without sending invitations. Provide EXACTLY ONE source: fileId (from upload_file) or templateId (from list_templates). Sending both, or neither, is an error. Using templateId is how you preview a template before sending it: the template's document and signature fields are copied into the draft, you review or adjust them, then send_draft. The template itself is never affected. Signee details, contact methods, signature type, and signature coordinates are optional while drafting. Full validation occurs only when send_draft is called. Call get_file_fields after upload_file if the PDF has form fields that should be pre-filled and saved in the draft. The draft name will become visible to signees when the draft is sent, so it should be a clear, human-readable title, not the uploaded filename. If deriving it from a PDF filename, strip the file extension unless the user explicitly wants to keep it. PREVIEW USE CASE: drafts are the recommended way to preview an uploaded document before sending. When the user wants to verify that signature fields, ID scan placeholders, or pre-filled values look correct, build the full configuration here, call get_draft_file_url to retrieve a one-time PDF preview, let the user verify (and adjust via update_draft if needed), then call send_draft to send.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
nameYesHuman-readable draft title that will be visible to signees when sent. If deriving from an uploaded PDF filename, strip the file extension (e.g. 'contract.pdf' → 'contract') unless the user explicitly wants the extension.
fieldsNoOptional form fields to pre-fill and save in the draft. Use exact field names from get_file_fields.
fileIdNoFile ID from upload_file. Mutually exclusive with templateId; exactly one of the two is required.
userIdNoUser ID to assign as draft owner. Defaults to the authenticated user.
languageNoLanguage for the eventual signing invitation
templateIdNoTemplate ID from list_templates. Mutually exclusive with fileId; exactly one of the two is required. Copies the template's document and signature fields into the draft, including any contact details it stores. Requires the templates capability.
aiAssistantNoOptional AI assistant that helps signees while reviewing the document. Requires the aiAssistant capability.
signeeDetailsNoOptional list of signees to save in the draft. Entries may be incomplete during the draft phase; fullName and a contact method are required before sending.
sharingSettingNoWhether the draft is private or shared with other users on the account
personalMessageNoOptional personal message for the eventual signing invitation. Maximum 500 characters.
enableSigningOrderNoEnable sequential signing order when the draft is sent (requires signingOrder capability)
fieldsReadonlyModeNoForm field read-only mode. Set to 'filled' when providing pre-filled values that should be locked for signers.

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed2 schema fields changed
    • changedInput schema / properties / signeeDetails / items / properties / idScanBox / description
      Previous value: -"ID scan placeholder coordinates. Required when a live document is sent with signatureType: 'digital_ink_id_scan'. Optional while saving a draft; full validation happens only when the draft is sent.\n\nCoordinate system: origin is at the top-left; x increases to the right and y increases downward. All coordinates and field sizes are specified in points (pt). The position (x, y) always refers to the top-left corner of the field.\n\nStandard ID scan field size at scale = 1.0 is 218 × 138 pt.\n\nIMPORTANT: Always check the actual page size of the PDF before calculating coordinates — do not assume A4. Common page sizes:\n- A4: 210 × 297 mm → 595 × 842 pt at 72 pt/in (pt = mm × 72 / 25.4). Example bottom-right: x = 595 - 218 = 377, y = 842 - 138 = 704, page = 0.\n- US Letter: 8.5 × 11 in → 612 × 792 pt at 72 pt/in. Example bottom-right: x = 612 - 218 = 394, y = 792 - 138 = 654, page = 0.\n\nCollision: Formify does not detect overlapping fields. You must ensure that no two fields share the same page and position, or overlap. Fields are fully opaque — placing a field on top of existing document content will hide it. Use scale to shrink a field when space is limited. Overlapping fields or fields placed over content result in a poor signing experience."New value: +"ID scan placeholder coordinates. Required when a live document is sent with signatureType: 'digital_ink_id_scan'. Optional while saving a draft; full validation happens only when the draft is sent. The ID document itself is captured and read on Formify's signing page; only the placeholder's position is configured here, and no image or document data passes through this API.\n\nCoordinate system: origin is at the top-left; x increases to the right and y increases downward. All coordinates and field sizes are specified in points (pt). The position (x, y) always refers to the top-left corner of the field.\n\nStandard ID scan field size at scale = 1.0 is 218 × 138 pt.\n\nIMPORTANT: Always check the actual page size of the PDF before calculating coordinates — do not assume A4. Common page sizes:\n- A4: 210 × 297 mm → 595 × 842 pt at 72 pt/in (pt = mm × 72 / 25.4). Example bottom-right: x = 595 - 218 = 377, y = 842 - 138 = 704, page = 0.\n- US Letter: 8.5 × 11 in → 612 × 792 pt at 72 pt/in. Example bottom-right: x = 612 - 218 = 394, y = 792 - 138 = 654, page = 0.\n\nCollision: Formify does not detect overlapping fields. You must ensure that no two fields share the same page and position, or overlap. Fields are fully opaque — placing a field on top of existing document content will hide it. Use scale to shrink a field when space is limited. Overlapping fields or fields placed over content result in a poor signing experience."
    • changedInput schema / properties / signeeDetails / items / properties / signatureType / description
      Previous value: -"Signature method. Optional while drafting. Non-default methods require account capabilities."New value: +"Signature method. Optional while drafting. Non-default methods require account capabilities. Identity verification for bankid_identification, digital_ink_id_scan and face_liveness is performed by Formify's signing page in the signer's browser, after the invitation is sent. This parameter only selects the method: no identity document, biometric data or national identity number is sent to, returned by or stored through this API."
  2. Changed3 schema fields changed
    • changedInput schema / properties / fileId / description
      Previous value: -"File ID from upload_file. Required for drafts; templateId is not supported."New value: +"File ID from upload_file. Mutually exclusive with templateId; exactly one of the two is required."
    • addedInput schema / properties / templateId
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "Template ID from list_templates. Mutually exclusive with fileId; exactly one of the two is required. Copies the template's document and signature fields into the draft, including any contact details it stores. Requires the templates capability.",
      +  "type": "string"
      +}
    • changedInput schema / required
      Previous value: -[
      -  "fileId",
      -  "name"
      -]New value: +[
      +  "name"
      +]
  3. First observed

TDQS

A4.7/5.0
Behavior5/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Beyond the minimal annotations (readOnly=false, destructive=false), the description discloses deferred validation ('Full validation occurs only when send_draft is called'), non-mutating template behavior ('The template itself is never affected'), and that the draft name will become visible to signees. These are behavioral traits an agent cannot infer from annotations alone.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is long but front-loaded with the core purpose and then structured into source rule, template preview, validation timing, naming, and a preview workflow. It remains focused, though the PREVIEW USE CASE paragraph partially recaps workflow steps already stated earlier, so it is not maximally tight.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a 12-parameter tool with nested objects and no output schema, the description covers the central workflow, error condition, preview path, and naming rules. The only notable gap is the absence of any statement about the return value (e.g., draft ID), which would matter more given there is no output schema.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% and the schema already documents the mutual-exclusivity rule, per-parameter optionality while drafting, and coordinate systems. The description adds a small amount on top — the cross-parameter 'EXACTLY ONE source' rule, the get_file_fields ordering prerequisite, and naming guidance — so it slightly exceeds the high-coverage baseline.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description opens with a specific verb and resource ('Create a draft document') and the qualifier 'without sending invitations' immediately distinguishes it from send_draft. It also references the two source parameters (fileId/templateId) and the preview workflow, leaving no ambiguity about what create_draft is for.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description explicitly says drafts are 'the recommended way to preview an uploaded document before sending' and gives the full chain — build config here, get_draft_file_url to preview, update_draft if needed, then send_draft. It also states the exact-one-source rule and that validation is deferred to send_draft, which tells the agent when to use this tool and what belongs to sibling tools.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

Resources