list_eventsUpcoming films, concerts, theatre and events on BinaSmart in Addis Ababa with venue, hall, start time, prices per tier and seats left. Seats are chosen and paid at the url returned (Chapa or at the counter); the ticket is a QR code.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Changes observed during successful MCP inspections. Dates show when Glama detected each change.
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
The annotations already declare readOnlyHint=true, but the description goes further by explaining that seats are selected and paid at a returned URL, payment can be via Chapa or at the counter, and the ticket is a QR code. This adds meaningful behavioral context beyond the annotations and clearly signals that booking/payment is not performed by this tool.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is two sentences with no filler. The first sentence front-loads scope and returned fields, and the second explains the follow-up payment/ticketing flow. Every clause adds useful information.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a zero-parameter read-only listing tool, the description is complete: it names the domain, location, and returned fields, and describes the downstream booking flow. Even without an output schema, an agent can confidently invoke the tool and interpret the result.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
The input schema has zero parameters, so the baseline is 4; there is no parameter information for the description to add. The description focuses on output content and behavior, which is appropriate since no parameters exist.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly identifies the resource (events on BinaSmart in Addis Ababa) and the returned details (venue, hall, start time, prices per tier, seats left). It is not phrased as an explicit verb statement like 'List...', but the tool name and content make the purpose unmistakable. It does not explicitly distinguish itself from the sibling list_films.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The description implies when to use the tool: for upcoming events in Addis Ababa. However, it provides no explicit comparison with alternatives such as list_films, and there is no guidance on when not to use it. Usage context is clear but must be inferred rather than stated.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.
Each tool targets a distinct action and resource: ride tools cleanly split quoting, booking, status, and cancellation; list_events and list_films are clearly separated between in-person events and online films; search_places points to dedicated hotel/hospital detail tools. No two tools have overlapping responsibilities.
All names are lowercase snake_case with a leading verb and a domain object, which makes the pattern predictable. There are minor inconsistencies: read operations mix list_ and get_, and get_ethiopia_guide is singular despite being able to return a collection of guides when called without a slug.
10 tools is well-scoped for a multi-vertical consumer platform. Each tool earns its place by covering a necessary step in ride booking, place discovery, entertainment listings, or guide access, with no redundant additions.
The ride lifecycle is well covered with quote, request, status, and cancel, and search_places feeds cleanly into hotel and hospital detail tools. Minor gaps exist for generic non-hotel/hospital place details and for transactional booking/rental actions, but those are partially handled via returned external URLs.