Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description adds the return format {model, id}, which is useful, but it does not disclose any other behavioral traits such as error handling, required permissions, or side effects. The readOnlyHint: false annotation already indicates a write operation, so the description adds minimal context beyond that.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is extremely short and front-loaded with the core action and return value, but it is under-specified. It is concise but not effective because it omits critical usage context, making it more of a stub than a well-structured description.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the presence of many sibling tools and the tool's complexity (nested objects, write operation), the description is too minimal. It lacks information about valid models, required value structures, or error behavior, leaving the agent without enough context to use it reliably.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100% for both parameters, though the descriptions are vague ('Modelo Odoo', 'Valores del nuevo registro'). The tool description does not add any further meaning to the parameters, so it does not compensate for the schema's lack of detail. Baseline 3 applies.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states a clear verb ('Crea') and a specific resource ('un registro'), and it mentions the return value {model, id}. It is unambiguous about the operation, though it does not differentiate from sibling tools like odoo_write or odoo_execute.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

There is no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. No mention of when creation is appropriate, prerequisites, or exclusions. The agent is left to infer usage from the name and description alone.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.