Skip to main content
Glama

One industry event with its organizer

ud_get_event
Read-onlyIdempotent

One industry event with its organizer, location and description. Pass slug (such as namescon-global-2026).

Tool call template

Replace each placeholder with a value matching the input schema. Only required parameters are included; add optional parameters as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {
      "slug": "<slug>"
    },
    "name": "ud_get_event"
  }
}

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
slugYesThe event's slug, at most 160 characters.
fieldsNoComma-separated top-level keys to keep: id, slug, title, startsOn, endsOn, category, countryCode, city, lat, lng, organizer, location, description.

Output Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
dataNo
metaNoThe day of the answer, and the page cursor of a list.
linksNoLinks of the answer.

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. First observed

TDQS

B3.3/5.0
Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnly, idempotent, closed-world and non-destructive, so the safety profile is fully covered. The description adds only that organizer, location and description are included in the payload, and says nothing about behavior when the slug does not match an event.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two short sentences with zero filler, and the payload contents are front-loaded before the invocation hint. Nothing could be removed without losing information.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness3/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

An output schema and full parameter descriptions exist, so the description need not explain return shape. However, for a lookup-by-identifier tool it omits the notable edge case (missing/invalid slug) and any routing cue versus ud_list_events, leaving the agent to infer both.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, so the baseline is 3. The description contributes only an example slug format ('namescon-global-2026'), which is mild added value beyond the schema's 'slug, at most 160 characters'. The `fields` projection parameter is not mentioned at all.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific resource and scope: a single industry event returned with its organizer, location and description. The singular 'One industry event' implicitly contrasts with the plural ud_list_events, but the description never names that sibling explicitly.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Only guidance is 'Pass slug', which is about how to invoke, not when to choose this over ud_list_events or ud_get_agenda. No prerequisites, no exclusions, no alternative named.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.