Skip to main content
Glama

Catalog headline totals for the latest day

ud_get_catalog_stats
Read-onlyIdempotent

Catalog headline totals for the latest day. Takes no input.

Tool call template

This tool declares no required parameters. Add optional parameters from the input schema as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {},
    "name": "ud_get_catalog_stats"
  }
}

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
fieldsNoComma-separated top-level keys to keep: day, domains, words, tlds.

Output Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
dataNo
metaNoThe day of the answer, and the page cursor of a list.
linksNoLinks of the answer.

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. First observed

TDQS

C2.9/5.0
Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint, idempotentHint, non-destructive and closed-world, so the safety profile is fully covered. The description adds the useful 'latest day' recency scope, but its claim 'Takes no input' is factually wrong given the optional fields parameter, which actively misleads about behavior.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness3/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two short sentences, front-loaded with the purpose, which is good. But the second sentence is not just wasted space — it is incorrect, so brevity comes at the cost of accuracy.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness3/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

An output schema exists, so return values need not be explained, and the tool is simple. Still, the false 'takes no input' statement leaves the agent with an incomplete and partly wrong picture of how to call it.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters2/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% and the fields parameter is well documented in the schema, so the baseline would be 3. However, the description asserts 'Takes no input', directly contradicting the existence of the fields projection parameter, which would cause an agent to miss a useful capability.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific resource (catalog headline totals) and a specific scope (latest day), which distinguishes it from siblings like ud_get_tld_stats or ud_get_meta_freshness. It does not explicitly name an alternative, but the verb+resource+scope is concrete enough for an agent to identify the tool.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

There is no guidance on when to use this versus the many sibling stats/aggregate tools (ud_get_tld_stats, ud_get_meta_freshness, ud_get_latest_edition). The 'latest day' scope implies a use case but no exclusions or alternatives are stated.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.