Skip to main content
Glama

get_support_info

Get support info for UAB Research Computing.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault

No arguments

TDQS

C2.9/5.0
Behavior2/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description carries full burden but only describes a simple retrieval; no disclosure of response format, side effects, or permissions.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

A single sentence that is concise and front-loaded with the key action and resource.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness2/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the absence of output schema and annotations, the description is too minimal; an agent cannot infer important details like return format or purpose beyond the name.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

No parameters in schema, so baseline is 3; description adds no value beyond schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action 'Get' and the resource 'support info for UAB Research Computing', which distinguishes it from sibling tools that deal with documentation pages, quick start, and search.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives; it simply states its purpose without context.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

TDQS

A3.5/5.0
Disambiguation5/5

Each tool has a clear, distinct purpose: quick start, documentation page retrieval, support info, listing sections, and searching. No overlaps or ambiguity.

Naming Consistency5/5

All tools use a consistent snake_case verb_noun pattern (get_*, list_*, search_*), making them predictable and easy to distinguish.

Tool Count5/5

5 tools is appropriate for a documentation/support server. It covers the essential actions without being too sparse or overloaded.

Completeness4/5

The tool set covers the main reading operations (list, search, get) and includes specific items like quick start and support info. However, it lacks navigation to sub-sections or a way to get all pages, which is a minor gap.

Resources