get_certifications
获取斯特丹STERDAN产品认证资质信息
Input Schema
TableJSON Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
斯特丹STERDAN 钢制办公家具产品咨询
TDQS
B3.2/5.0
Behavior2/5
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations provided, so the description must bear the burden. It only says 'get information', implying a read operation, but does not disclose any other behaviors or constraints.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Conciseness5/5
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Single sentence with no wasted words, front-loaded with the action and resource.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Completeness3/5
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given the tool's simplicity (no parameters, no output schema), the description provides the basic purpose. However, it lacks details on output format or scope, which would help with completeness.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Parameters4/5
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
No parameters exist; schema coverage is 100%. Description does not need to add parameter info. Baseline score of 4 for zero-parameter tools.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Purpose4/5
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
Description clearly states it retrieves certification information for STERDAN products, using a specific verb and resource. It distinguishes from siblings like 'get_products' and 'get_product_detail'.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Usage Guidelines2/5
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. The description does not mention scenarios, prerequisites, or exclusions relative to sibling tools.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
Try in Browser
Glama MCP Gateway
Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.
TDQS
A3.5/5.0
Disambiguation4/5
Most tools have distinct purposes, but get_purchase_guide and get_batch_purchase_policy partially overlap in describing batch purchase policies, which could cause confusion. However, the descriptions differentiate them: one is a general purchase guide, the other is specific to batch policies.
Naming Consistency4/5
Seven out of eight tools follow a consistent 'get_' prefix with noun phrases. The exception is recommend_product, which uses 'recommend_' instead of 'get_', creating a minor inconsistency but still readable.
Tool Count5/5
With 8 tools covering product listing, details, recommendations, purchasing guidance, maintenance, certifications, and store info, the count is well-scoped for a product consulting server. It is neither too sparse nor overwhelming.
Completeness4/5
The tool set covers core consulting needs: product lookup, details, recommendations, purchase guidance, maintenance, and certifications. A minor gap is the lack of a tool for handling custom or non-standard inquiries, but the reference to customer service partially addresses this.