Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema coverage is 100%, so the baseline is 3; the schema already explains `work`, `limit`, `page`, and `urantia_parallel_limit`. The description reinforces `work` scoping and implies the Urantia-paragraph attachment (urantia_parallel_limit), but adds no syntax or interaction detail (e.g., paging versus the 100-chunk cap) beyond the schema.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.