Skip to main content
Glama

Get keyword

get_keyword
Read-onlyIdempotent

Fetches a keyword by id. Returns its setup (term, kind, platforms, matching rules, context, monthly cap, pausedForCap), its stats and how polling goes on each platform.

Tool call template

Replace each placeholder with a value matching the input schema. Only required parameters are included; add optional parameters as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {
      "id": "<id>"
    },
    "name": "get_keyword"
  }
}

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
idYesThe keyword's id (kw_...)

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. First observed

TDQS

A3.7/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnly, idempotent, non-destructive, closed-world behavior, so the safety profile is covered. The description earns extra credit by disclosing what the response contains (setup fields, stats, per-platform polling status), which the annotations cannot convey and no output schema exists to supply.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two sentences, front-loaded with the operation and followed by the return shape; no filler. The parenthetical field list is dense but each item is informative rather than decorative.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With no output schema, the description must carry the return-value burden, and it does by naming the setup, stat, and polling components. Combined with 100% parameter coverage and full annotations, an agent has enough to invoke and interpret this tool correctly.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100% and the single id parameter is fully documented with its 'kw_...' format, so the description adds nothing beyond 'by id'. Baseline 3 applies when the schema carries the parameter semantics.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific verb and resource ('Fetches a keyword by id') and enumerates the returned payload, so the agent knows this is a single-record read rather than a listing. It does not explicitly distinguish itself from get_keyword_health or list_keywords, so sibling differentiation is left to the name.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines3/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Usage is only implied: 'by id' signals the single-record lookup path versus list_keywords, but there is no explicit when-to-use statement and no mention of alternatives such as get_keyword_health or update_keyword. The agent can infer intent but is given no routing guidance.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.