MoneyTools x402 agent toolkit

Regex tester

regex_test

Read-onlyIdempotent

Run a JavaScript regex on text: all matches with index and capture groups, optional replace, and a ReDoS warning for nested quantifiers. Free: 10 calls/day; then $0.001/call via x402 (MCP params._meta["x402/payment"] or HTTP) or X-API-Key credits. [served by tools.moneytools.dev]

Tool call template

Replace each placeholder with a value matching the input schema. Only required parameters are included; add optional parameters as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {
      "pattern": "<pattern>",
      "text": "<text>"
    },
    "name": "regex_test"
  }
}

Input Schema

Name	Required	Description
`text`	Yes	input text
`flags`	No	flags
`pattern`	Yes	regex source
`replace`	No	replacement string

Output Schema

Name	Required	Description	Default
No arguments

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

AddedNov 4, 2026

TDQS

A3.9/5.0

Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already cover the safety profile (readOnly, idempotent, non-destructive), and the description adds genuinely new behavioral context: a ReDoS warning for nested quantifiers, the output shape, and the auth/payment and rate-limit model (10 free calls/day, per-call pricing, payment channels). It stops short of explaining what happens to the output when 'replace' is supplied.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Front-loaded with a dense, information-rich first sentence that names purpose and outputs together. The pricing sentence is crammed with payment-mechanism detail and the trailing '[served by tools.moneytools.dev]' is low-value boilerplate, but nothing is truly wasted.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

An output schema exists, so return values need not be explained, and the description still covers output shape, safety caveats and the billing/access model that an agent needs before calling. Only minor gaps remain, such as flag semantics and replace-mode result behavior.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so the schema already documents text, flags, pattern and replace; the description only signals that 'replace' is optional. It adds little meaning beyond the schema, so the baseline of 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific verb and resource ('Run a JavaScript regex on text') and enumerates the exact outputs: all matches with index and capture groups, plus an optional replace mode. The mention of the JS engine and the ReDoS check further pins down what this tool does versus a generic text-search utility.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines3/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Usage is implied by the keywords 'JavaScript regex' and 'replace', which tell an agent when this applies, but there is no explicit when-to-use/when-not or reference to an alternative tool for similar parsing tasks. No prerequisites or exclusions are stated.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

All MoneyTools x402 agent toolkit tools Inspect

Try in Browser

One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

Resources

Need Help?