Skip to main content
Glama

check_minimum_wage

Read-onlyIdempotent

PAID ($0.02). Compliance verdict: is a salary at, above or below the country's statutory minimum wage? Returns verdict, margin, the statutory floor and the legal instrument it rests on. Honest statuses when no enforceable floor exists or the period doesn't match the floor's period (cross-period conversion is never guessed). Pass api_key if you have one (instant card checkout at /pricing); otherwise the response explains how to pay via x402. The evaluation country is free to try (see list_series). Optional receipt (boolean, default false): on a paid success, include an Ed25519 answer receipt at no extra USDC. An answer receipt is not a series certified extract (GET /v1/certified/{country}/{series} is $0.10 and is not an MCP tool) and is not legal advice. Verify with verify_answer_receipt against /certified/public-key.

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
amountYesWage to check, in the country's own currency
periodYesPeriod the amount covers — must match the statutory floor's period
api_keyNoAPI key (bypasses x402; metered for invoicing)
countryYesISO country code
receiptNoDefault false. When true, a paid success includes an Ed25519 answer receipt (kind answer_receipt) at no extra USDC. Unpaid 402 and free refusals do not include one. Not a series certified extract (GET /v1/certified/{country}/{series} at $0.10; that SKU is not an MCP tool).

Output Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
basisNo
errorNoPresent on a free refusal or error; no charge
floorNo
statusNoAnswer status, e.g. computed or an honest no-answer status
countryNo
receiptNoEd25519 answer receipt when receipt=true on a paid success
verdictNo
questionNo
no_chargeNo
price_usdNo
disclaimerNo
how_to_payNo
provenanceNoCited official sources behind the answer
bind_seriesNo
explanationNo
label_basisNoInputs and the rule ids that produced the two labels
x_next_bindNo
http_endpointNo
coverage_labelNoHow much of the question is covered: ready = complete; partial = held with a disclosed limitation or default; gap = no number served. Rules at /label-rules
confidence_labelNoEvidence verdict derived from source type, verification age and the stale flag (answers: the weakest series read). Rules at /label-rules
payment_requiredNotrue when the call needs payment; how_to_pay explains x402 or card

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed5 schema fields changed
    • changedInput schema / properties / receipt / description
      Previous value: -"Default false. When true, a paid success includes an Ed25519 answer receipt (kind answer_receipt) at no extra USDC. Unpaid 402 and free refusals do not include one. Not a series certified extract (GET /v1/certified/{country}/{series} at $0.25; that SKU is not an MCP tool)."New value: +"Default false. When true, a paid success includes an Ed25519 answer receipt (kind answer_receipt) at no extra USDC. Unpaid 402 and free refusals do not include one. Not a series certified extract (GET /v1/certified/{country}/{series} at $0.10; that SKU is not an MCP tool)."
    • removedOutput schema / properties / label_basis / properties / source_type / anyOf
      Removed value: -[
      -  {
      -    "type": "string"
      -  },
      -  {
      -    "type": "null"
      -  }
      -]
    • addedOutput schema / properties / label_basis / properties / source_type / type
      Added value: +[
      +  "string",
      +  "null"
      +]
    • removedOutput schema / properties / label_basis / properties / verification_age_days / anyOf
      Removed value: -[
      -  {
      -    "type": "number"
      -  },
      -  {
      -    "type": "null"
      -  }
      -]
    • addedOutput schema / properties / label_basis / properties / verification_age_days / type
      Added value: +[
      +  "number",
      +  "null"
      +]
  2. Changed3 schema fields changed
    • addedOutput schema / properties / confidence_label
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "Evidence verdict derived from source type, verification age and the stale flag (answers: the weakest series read). Rules at /label-rules",
      +  "enum": [
      +    "high",
      +    "medium",
      +    "low"
      +  ],
      +  "type": "string"
      +}
    • addedOutput schema / properties / coverage_label
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "How much of the question is covered: ready = complete; partial = held with a disclosed limitation or default; gap = no number served. Rules at /label-rules",
      +  "enum": [
      +    "ready",
      +    "partial",
      +    "gap"
      +  ],
      +  "type": "string"
      +}
    • addedOutput schema / properties / label_basis
      Added value: +{
      +  "additionalProperties": {},
      +  "description": "Inputs and the rule ids that produced the two labels",
      +  "properties": {
      +    "confidence_reasons": {
      +      "items": {
      +        "type": "string"
      +      },
      +      "type": "array"
      +    },
      +    "coverage_reasons": {
      +      "items": {
      +        "type": "string"
      +      },
      +      "type": "array"
      +    },
      +    "inputs": {
      +      "items": {},
      +      "type": "array"
      +    },
      +    "rules": {
      +      "type": "string"
      +    },
      +    "rules_version": {
      +      "type": "string"
      +    },
      +    "source_type": {
      +      "anyOf": [
      +        {
      +          "type": "string"
      +        },
      +        {
      +          "type": "null"
      +        }
      +      ]
      +    },
      +    "stale": {
      +      "type": "boolean"
      +    },
      +    "verification_age_days": {
      +      "anyOf": [
      +        {
      +          "type": "number"
      +        },
      +        {
      +          "type": "null"
      +        }
      +      ]
      +    }
      +  },
      +  "type": "object"
      +}
  3. Changed1 schema field changed
    • changedOutput schema / (root)
      Previous value: -nullNew value: +{
      +  "$schema": "http://json-schema.org/draft-07/schema#",
      +  "additionalProperties": {},
      +  "description": "Minimum-wage compliance verdict",
      +  "properties": {
      +    "basis": {},
      +    "bind_series": {},
      +    "country": {
      +      "type": "string"
      +    },
      +    "disclaimer": {},
      +    "error": {
      +      "description": "Present on a free refusal or error; no charge"
      +    },
      +    "explanation": {},
      +    "floor": {},
      +    "how_to_pay": {
      +      "items": {
      +        "type": "string"
      +      },
      +      "type": "array"
      +    },
      +    "http_endpoint": {
      +      "type": "string"
      +    },
      +    "no_charge": {
      +      "type": "boolean"
      +    },
      +    "payment_required": {
      +      "description": "true when the call needs payment; how_to_pay explains x402 or card",
      +      "type": "boolean"
      +    },
      +    "price_usd": {
      +      "type": "number"
      +    },
      +    "provenance": {
      +      "description": "Cited official sources behind the answer"
      +    },
      +    "question": {},
      +    "receipt": {
      +      "description": "Ed25519 answer receipt when receipt=true on a paid success"
      +    },
      +    "status": {
      +      "description": "Answer status, e.g. computed or an honest no-answer status",
      +      "type": "string"
      +    },
      +    "verdict": {},
      +    "x_next_bind": {}
      +  },
      +  "type": "object"
      +}
  4. Changed1 schema field changed
    • addedInput schema / properties / receipt
      Added value: +{
      +  "default": false,
      +  "description": "Default false. When true, a paid success includes an Ed25519 answer receipt (kind answer_receipt) at no extra USDC. Unpaid 402 and free refusals do not include one. Not a series certified extract (GET /v1/certified/{country}/{series} at $0.25; that SKU is not an MCP tool).",
      +  "type": "boolean"
      +}
  5. First observed

TDQS

A4.6/5.0
Behavior5/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already cover read-only/idempotent safety, and the description layers on pricing ($0.02), auth/payment flow, honest statuses when no enforceable floor exists, the refusal to guess cross-period conversions, receipt semantics, and a not-legal-advice disclaimer. This is substantial behavior beyond structured fields.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Purpose and output are front-loaded, and the payment/disclaimer content is relevant. However, the single dense paragraph with nested parentheticals about x402, certified extracts, and receipts is crowded enough to slightly impede scanning.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

An output schema exists so return values needn't be explained, yet the description still summarizes them; combined with payment, receipt, and edge-case handling, an agent has everything needed to invoke it correctly.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, so baseline is 3; the description still adds meaning for api_key (bypasses x402, metered) and receipt (no extra USDC, unpaid 402s excluded) and clarifies that period must match the floor's period. Some content duplicates the schema, keeping it from a 5.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific verb+resource ('is a salary at, above or below the country's statutory minimum wage?') and names the exact outputs (verdict, margin, statutory floor, legal instrument). No sibling tool covers minimum-wage compliance, so it is clearly distinguishable.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Explains the payment paths (api_key for instant checkout vs x402), notes the evaluation country is free to try, and points to list_series for the country list. It lacks explicit when-not-to-use guidance versus siblings, but the context is clear.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

Resources