Skip to main content
Glama

Instadata — Instagram Data API

Get an account profile

get_profile
Read-onlyIdempotent

Profile, page or channel record for a public account: follower and subscriber counts, bio, and totals. Instagram only. Credits: 1 per call. Input: handle.

Tool call template

Replace each placeholder with a value matching the input schema. Only required parameters are included; add optional parameters as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {
      "handle": "<handle>"
    },
    "name": "get_profile"
  }
}

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
handleYesAccount handle, without the @.

Output Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
dataYesThe endpoint's payload: one object, or an array for list calls.
metaNocount, limit and next_cursor on list calls; credits_charged, credits_remaining and cache (hit or miss) on billed calls; limit_clamped when fewer items were requested upstream than the balance could cover; limit_capped when a free account's request was lowered to the free tier's 5-item ceiling.
request_idNo

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. First observed

TDQS

A3.7/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint, idempotentHint, openWorldHint and destructiveHint=false, so the safety profile is covered. The description adds genuinely non-structured context: the platform restriction (Instagram only) and the credit cost per call, both of which affect whether and how often an agent invokes it.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Front-loaded with the returned resource and kept to a few telegraphic fragments with no wasted prose. The clipped phrasing ('Input: handle') is slightly redundant given the schema but costs little.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With an output schema present, return-value detail is unnecessary, and the definition covers platform scope, cost, and input. For a one-parameter read tool this is nearly sufficient; only the sibling-selection guidance is missing.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% and the single handle parameter is fully documented in the schema ('without the @'). The description's 'Input: handle' merely restates the parameter name without adding format or resolution semantics, so this sits at the baseline.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Names the resource precisely — the profile/page/channel record for a public account — and enumerates the payload (follower and subscriber counts, bio, totals). It does not explicitly contrast itself with siblings like get_channel_posts or get_summary, so an agent must still infer that this is the account-level lookup, but the get+profile pairing is unambiguous.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines3/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

'Instagram only' is an explicit scope restriction and 'Credits: 1 per call' signals cost, which helps an agent decide whether to spend a call. However, there is no statement of when to prefer this over get_summary or get_channel_posts, so the alternative-selection guidance is only implied.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

Resources