Get collection
shop_get_collectionReturns the details of a specific collection. Guidance: Returns the details of a specific collection. | context: collection_id
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| collection_id | Yes | Collection Unique ID. |
shop_get_collectionReturns the details of a specific collection. Guidance: Returns the details of a specific collection. | context: collection_id
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| collection_id | Yes | Collection Unique ID. |
Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
Annotations already declare readOnly, idempotent, and not destructive. The description is consistent with these, adding no further behavioral detail.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The second sentence is redundant and awkward, repeating the purpose and appending 'context: collection_id' without value. The first sentence alone would have been sufficient and clear.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a simple read-only getter with one well-described parameter, the core functionality is covered. However, the redundant guidance adds noise and no additional context.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema provides a clear description for collection_id ('Collection Unique ID.'), covering 100% of parameters. Description adds no extra semantic detail beyond the schema.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
Clearly states 'Returns the details of a specific collection', identifying the verb and object. Distinguished from list_collections by the word 'specific'.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No explicit guidance on when to use this tool instead of alternatives like shop_list_collections. The 'Guidance' line merely restates the purpose without adding selection criteria.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.